Why Your Students Keep Messing Up Order of Operations
I've been grading papers for about fifteen years and I see the same patterns over and over. The 1 2 Skills Practice Order Of Operations worksheets that most curriculum companies hand out look clean on paper but fall apart the moment a student hits a problem with nested grouping symbols or negative exponents mixed into a fraction bar situation. I need to explain how to actually work through these problems instead of just hoping the kids memorize PEMDAS like a spell. Here's the thing nobody tells you: PEMDAS is basically useless if you don't understand what the letters are actually standing for in practice. It's Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication and Division (left to right), Addition and Subtraction (left to right). But when I show students how to circle and cross out each part as they solve, the whole thing becomes something they can actually do rather than something they chant and then guess wrong on anyway.
1 2 Skills Practice Order Of Operations
The first step that matters is teaching students to identify what operation belongs first before they touch their calculators. This means looking at the entire expression and scanning for grouping symbols. I make my students start every single problem by underlining any parentheses, brackets, or fraction bars with a pencil. It takes maybe twenty extra seconds per problem but it cuts error rates down significantly because they stop treating the problem like a random string of numbers and symbols. I had a student last semester who consistently got the answer wrong on problems like 3 times 2 squared plus 5 minus 1. She would multiply 2 plus 5 first and then square it. She understood exponents in isolation but when they showed up inside a larger expression she'd default to going left to right. What worked for her was having her literally write the step numbers above each operation as she processed them. Step one above the exponent, step two above the multiplication, and so on. She stopped guessing which part came first once she could physically see the sequence.
The Worked Method I Actually Use In Class
Start with the expression. Identify the outermost grouping symbol first. Then work inward. For exponents, remember that they apply only to the base immediately before them unless parentheses dictate otherwise. Multiplication and division are equal in priority so you handle them in the order they appear from left to right. Same thing with addition and subtraction. This left to right rule inside each priority tier is where most people lose points. Let me give you a concrete example that trips up advanced students too. Take this problem: 4 plus 6 divided by 2 times 3 minus 1. A lot of students will multiply 2 times 3 first and then divide. Wrong. It's division first because it appears to the left of the multiplication. The answer is 13, not 7. I see this mistake at the AP level regularly. When students try to speed through problems they unconsciously reorder operations based on what looks easier rather than what the rules actually require. Another practical note about decimal-heavy problems. I've found that having students convert everything to fractions first when possible removes a huge source of rounding errors. One of my better students last year was consistently getting within point five of the correct answer on multi-step problems because she was rounding at each intermediate step instead of holding the full precision until the end. I started requiring her to work with exact fractions and the accuracy jumped to nearly perfect on the same problem sets.
Get the Full Details

Common Pitfalls That Derail Everything
The biggest issue I run into year after year is the treatment of implied multiplication. When a student sees 2x plus 3 and then encounters a larger expression like 2 times x plus 3 squared, they often treat the implied multiplication in 2 times as lower priority than it actually is. The answer is 38, not 49. I have to drill into them that implied multiplication has the same precedence as written multiplication. Fraction bar confusion is the second major problem. Students see 5 plus 10 divided by 2 plus 5 and they either do the addition first or treat the denominator as just the 5 on the right side. A fraction bar acts exactly like a grouping symbol for everything underneath it. That expression equals 7.5, not 10 and not something else entirely. When I draw an actual line under the entire denominator in problems like this the light bulb goes on for about eighty percent of my class immediately.
What These Worksheets Miss and What You Should Supplement
Most published 1 2 Skills Practice Order Of Operations materials focus on clean problems with whole numbers. They rarely include negative numbers inside groupings, variables mixed with constants, or problems that require recognizing equivalent expressions. If you're using these worksheets as your primary resource you're leaving gaps. I supplement with my own worksheets that include at least a third of problems involving negatives and a few that require reverse engineering like finding the original expression given a final answer and a set of operations. The skill doesn't build linearly either. Students need repeated exposure across different contexts over weeks, not a two week unit and then nothing. I revisit order of operations every Thursday for the entire semester through warm up problems even though we're doing algebra and geometry later in the year. The maintenance matters more than the initial instruction for retention.
Where This Approach Breaks Down
I should be honest about the limitations. Order of operations practice sheets only build mechanical fluency. They don't develop the kind of number sense that lets a student quickly estimate whether an answer is reasonable. A kid can perfectly follow the steps and still get 147 as the answer to 8 times 5 plus 3 minus 2 when the real answer is 41. I pair the worksheet practice with quick mental estimation requirements so students develop that check habit. Also, calculator-dependent students often skip the mental processing entirely. My recommendation is to require pencil and paper work for the first week of any new unit before allowing calculator verification. This builds the procedural fluency that the calculator then confirms rather than replaces. Without that discipline the practice loses most of its value. The downloadable resources available online vary wildly in quality. Some of the free ones I've seen actually contain incorrect answer keys on problems with multiple grouping symbols. Always verify a few answers yourself before handing anything to students. A single wrong key in the back of a worksheet can reinforce the wrong method more firmly than any correction session could undo.
