Working With Merriman's Volume 2: What Actually Happens When You Use It
Most people pick up this book expecting a straightforward narrative history and end up wrestling with its structure instead. The second volume covers roughly 1815 to the present, and the way Merriman organizes the material isn't always intuitive if you're using it for research or serious study rather than casual reading. I've used this textbook across multiple semesters and the main issue people hit is the source apparatus. Merriman weaves archival material, parliamentary records, and contemporary commentary throughout the chapters rather than grouping them at the end. This means if you're hunting for a specific primary document cited in a lecture, flipping through the notes section at the back works fine, but if you need to trace a particular citation back to its original context, you have to flip between the main text and the notes constantly. I stopped trying to work that way about five years ago. Now I keep the book open on one side of my desk and a legal pad on the other, and I write down every footnote reference with its page number as I encounter it. It takes maybe twenty extra minutes per chapter but saves me from going back and searching later, which usually eats an hour. The second edition makes some updates to the Cold War and post-Cold War sections that the first edition didn't cover as thoroughly. Specifically, the treatment of the Yugoslav wars gets substantially more detail, and there are revised assessments of the Euro crisis that reflect developments through around 2016. If you're citing this book in academic work, make sure you know which edition your institution expects. I once had a graduate student submit a paper using edition references from version 1 while the department's style guide required edition 2 citations. The page numbers were off by about eight to twelve pages in the later chapters. It delayed the revision process by three weeks.
Another thing nobody really warns you about is the geographic balance. Merriman is thorough on France, Germany, and Britain, but the chapters on Eastern Europe and the Balkans compress a lot of complex material into relatively narrow space. The 1848 revolutions get perhaps thirty pages total for the entire continent, and the post-Soviet transitions in the final chapters feel rushed compared to the depth given to Western European integration. If your research focuses on Central or Eastern Europe, you will need supplementary sources regardless of how much you rely on this volume. I recommend pairing it with Norman Davies for Eastern European depth and Timothy Garton Ash for the late twentieth century. The bibliography at the back of each chapter is actually one of the stronger features, though it's easy to overlook because it's embedded within the chapter notes rather than presented as a standalone resource. Some of the sources listed there are still highly relevant for current research, particularly in the economic history sections where Merriman draws on recent statistical work from the Cliometric school. The index is adequate but not comprehensive. I've found entries missing for terms I considered essential, like "cartels" and "bimetallism," which required me to search the text manually rather than relying on the index. For anyone using this for exam preparation or course writing, the chronological approach works well for building a timeline understanding but can obscure thematic connections. The book doesn't repeatedly circle back to connect, say, the labor movements of the 1870s with those of the 1930s in a way that helps you see continuity. You have to do that synthesis yourself. I found it useful to maintain a separate thematic outline alongside the book's structure, noting where similar patterns recurred across different decades. This took additional effort upfront but made writing comparative essays significantly faster later on.
The paperback edition is reasonable for the price point and the binding holds up adequately through normal handling. The hardcover version exists but the page stock and typography are essentially identical between editions. Nothing about the physical production affects the scholarly content, so there's no strong reason to spend more unless you're building a personal reference library. The digital version, where available, has search functionality that partially compensates for the index limitations, but the OCR quality on some of the earlier pages can be inconsistent, particularly with passages containing special characters and foreign language terms. Overall this remains one of the more reliable single-volume survey texts for modern European history at the undergraduate and early graduate level. It won't replace specialized monographs for deep research, and its organizational choices require you to do additional synthesis work, but for building a solid chronological and institutional understanding of the period from the Congress of Vienna onward, it does what it sets out to do without the major flaws that plague several competing textbooks in this space.
Get the Full Details
