What the Template Actually Looks Like
An academic journal entry for grief doesn't have to be long. Most submissions I've handled came in around 2,000 to 4,000 words. The structure tends to follow a modified IMRaD format, but the "Discussion" section is where the grief-specific framing shows up most clearly. The template breaks down into six parts: Introduction: State the research question or clinical observation clearly. If you're writing about a case study, say exactly which population you're focusing on — complicated grief, anticipatory grief, disenfranchised grief, perinatal loss, etc. Don't lump them together unless your methodology explicitly supports that.
Methods: This depends on whether you're doing qualitative or quantitative work. For qualitative grief studies, note your interview protocol, your coding approach, and your reflexivity statement. I once had a reviewer reject a submission because the author described semi-structured interviews but didn't explain how they managed researcher positionality when interviewing bereaved participants. That's a common gap. Add a short paragraph on your role, your relationship to the topic, and any assumptions you brought in. Results or Findings: Present your data before interpreting it. In grief research, this section often includes themes from qualitative work or statistical outcomes from scale-based studies. Use established instruments where possible — the Inventory of Complicated Grief, the Texas Revised Inventory of Grief, the Brief Grief Questionnaire. Journal editors expect to see which tool you used and why. Discussion: This is the section that distinguishes a grief paper from a generic mental health paper. Connect your findings back to grief theory. Worden's tasks model, Neimeyer's meaning reconstruction framework, Stroebe and Schut's dual process model — pick the ones that actually apply to your data rather than name-dropping all three. A reviewer in my field once flagged a paper that cited dual process model but didn't actually measure oscillation between loss-oriented and restoration-oriented coping. The analysis was just standard depressive symptom tracking.
Limits: Grief research has persistent sampling problems. Most studies rely on convenience samples from support groups or online communities, which skews toward people who are already engaged in grief processing. If your participants were recruited that way, say so. Don't pretend your findings generalize to the whole bereaved population. References: Follow the target journal's style guide exactly. APA 7th is most common in psychology and counseling journals. Some grief-specific journals like Kübler-Ross or The American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care have their own preferences.
Get the Full Details
What Actually Goes Wrong
I've seen three recurring problems with grief manuscripts that have nothing to do with the research quality itself. First, authors conflate sadness with grief. Clinical grief research requires operational definitions. If you're studying grief, you need to specify what symptom cluster, duration threshold, and functional impairment level you're treating as your dependent variable. Otherwise reviewers will ask for clarification and the revision process drags out. Second, ethical review gets messy when grief populations are involved. IRBs sometimes push back on studying recently bereaved people because of vulnerability concerns. I worked on a project where the original protocol required all participants to be at least six months post-loss. The site IRB approved it with a condition — we had to include a scripted referral pathway for anyone showing acute suicidal ideation during the interview. That detail didn't make it into our final methods section until the ethics committee wrote back. Build that referral infrastructure into your protocol before you submit.
Third, the language tends to slip into clinical distance when the topic demands some precision. Writing about someone's child dying isn't the same as writing about "a death event." Terminology matters to both reviewers and readers. Use the specific language from your study's framework consistently.
Download
A working version of this template in Word format is available through the research resources page. It includes placeholder text for each section, a reflexivity statement sample, and a table for documenting which grief assessment instrument you selected and why.
