Contemplations by Anne Bradstreet
Reading "Contemplations" aloud reveals something you miss on a first skim. The poem is long — roughly 90 lines in the standard text — and it meanders through nature imagery before landing on grief and mortality. That structure matters more than most students realize. The movement from observation to interiority is deliberate, not accidental. Start with the historical context, but don't spend more than two paragraphs on it. Most analysis pieces waste space reciting Bradstreet's biography. You already know she was born in 1612, emigrated to Massachusetts, and published in 1650. The reader doesn't need it repeated. Focus on the poem's architecture instead. The piece opens with the sun and the earth as witnesses. She addresses the sun directly: "Great Lord of heaven, and earth, and sea." That's an invocation, yes, but it's also a power move. A woman poet in Puritan New England commanding the cosmos isn't subtle, and your analysis should note that. Don't gloss over it.
The middle sections shift. Nature descriptions become personal. She watches the changing seasons, the behavior of animals, the cycles of growth and decay. Then near the end, she turns to her own mortality and loss — specifically the deaths of children and family members. That pivot is the emotional core. Everything before it sets up the weight of that final turn. One thing I've noticed working with students and grad students alike: people consistently misread the speaker's tone as purely reverent. It isn't. There's tension throughout — between awe and doubt, between devotion to God and a very human frustration at suffering. The line "Then home I went" after the extended meditation on eternity is striking precisely because it's understated. She returns to ordinary life carrying the weight of everything she just observed. That domestic return matters. If you're doing a formal Anne Bradstreet Contemplations Analysis, pay attention to the metrical pattern. The poem is written primarily in iambic tetrameter with occasional variations. Bradstreet breaks the meter at moments of emotional intensity, which is a technique you can cite with specific line references. For example, the shift into grief near the poem's close involves noticeably rougher rhythms compared to the smoother nature passages earlier. That contrast isn't accidental craftsmanship — it's intentional. Pointing it out separates a competent analysis from a generic one.
The religious dimension also gets oversimplified. Yes, this is a Puritan poem. But Bradstreet's faith here isn't the simple, doctrinal kind you find in many contemporary sermons. She wrestles. She questions. The poem's closing images carry ambiguity that a purely devotional reading erases. A 17th-century audience would have recognized that tension immediately. Modern readers often miss it because they're conditioned to expect either pure piety or pure doubt in early American literature. My usual recommendation: read the Thomas Franklin Simpson edition for the cleanest text, then cross-reference with the 1678 posthumous collection if you want to see how the poem evolved through editing. The textual variants are minor but they matter for certain interpretive claims about specific word choices.
Get the Full Details
