Anthology Of American Literature 10th Edition Citation

How I stopped losing points on my lit paper over citation formatting

I spent three hours last November trying to get my professor to accept an MLA Works Cited page because I'd misread a single comma in the Anthology Of American Literature 10th Edition Citation guidelines. Three hours. Over punctuation. She returned it with a single red mark on line 4 and wrote "check the anthology edition rules again" at the bottom. I had to resubmit by midnight. Here's what actually happened and what I wish someone had just told me straight.

Anthology Of American Literature 10th Edition Citation basics

The 10th edition of the Norton Anthology of American Literature is edited by Greenleaf, Ferguson, Moogck, Lowance, Saunders, and others. It comes in multiple volumes now—Vol. A covers early stuff through the Civil War, Vol. B runs Reconstruction to 1914, and so on. When you cite it, you're not citing a single book. You're citing an excerpt inside an edited collection, which means your citation has to layer two different authorship relationships: the original author of the poem or essay, and the anthology editors. The MLA 9th edition rules apply here. That means:

• Author of the work being cited goes first, not the anthology editors Then the title of the piece in quotation marks Then The Norton Anthology of American Literature in italics

  Get the Full Details

  Learn More

  

  Then the edition number, volume number, publisher, year, and page range Then the DOI or URL if you accessed it online through the Norton site That last part trips people up constantly. The 10th edition has a digital version at nortonanthologies.com, and if you pulled the text from there instead of the physical book, you need to include the URL and your access date. Professors rarely enforce this, but it's technically required by MLA.

  My mistake was putting the anthology editors in the author slot. I wrote something like this on my first draft: Greenleaf, Lethbridge, et al., editors. The Norton Anthology of American Literature. 10th ed., vol. A, W.W. Norton, 2021, pp. 234-237. That's wrong because Greenleaf and the crew edited the anthology, they didn't write the poem I was citing. If I was quoting Philip Freneau's "The Indian Burying Ground," then Freneau is the author. The anthology editors come later in the citation, as the container. Here's what it should actually look like:

  Freneau, Philip. "The Indian Burying Ground." The Norton Anthology of American Literature, edited by Lethbridge Greenleaf et al., 10th ed., vol. A, W.W. Norton, 2021, pp. 234-237. Notice the word "edited" before the names. That's the signal that tells the reader these people compiled the book, not wrote the piece. Miss that and your citation implies Freneau handed the manuscript directly to Greenleaf, which is chronologically impossible but apparently a common assumption among undergraduates.

  

  When the anthology has no clear author

  Sometimes the excerpt you're citing doesn't have a named author. The 10th edition includes anonymous documents—sermons, political broadsides, slave narratives that were published without bylines. When you encounter these, MLA says you start with the title in place of the author slot, then move to the anthology information. No "Anonymous" placeholder unless the original source actually uses that designation. I ran into this with the Plymouth Colony regulations section in Vol. A. The document itself is unsigned. I was tempted to write "Anonymous" as the author, but that's not how the 10th edition presents it. The Norton editors just list it under its title. My citation started with "Certain Rules and Orders..." not "Anonymous. Certain Rules and Orders..." Wrong approach, right result. The rule is: match how the source material presents itself, not how you want it to present itself.

  Pagination across volumes

  This is the edge case nobody warns you about. The 10th edition paginates each volume separately. Volume A runs from page 1 to roughly 1,700. Volume B starts again at page 1. If you're citing one piece from Vol. A and another from Vol. B in the same paper, your Works Cited entries will both show "p. 45" or whatever, and your in-text citations need to make clear which volume you mean. The workaround I use: in my parenthetical citations, I add the volume letter when there's any chance of confusion. Something like (Freneau 234, vol. A) or just (A 234) if I've established the volume system earlier. My professor preferred the latter. Other professors want the full volume reference in the Works Cited and clean parentheticals. Check your syllabus or just ask—spending five minutes on this prevents twelve hours of revision later.

  The online version problem

  If you accessed the 10th edition through a university library subscription or the Norton Anthologies website, you need to treat it differently than the print version. MLA requires the database name or website, the URL, and the access date. But here's the thing: the Norton site doesn't always give you stable URLs. They change them. I learned this the hard way when a classmate submitted a Works Cited entry with a URL that 404'd by the time the professor checked it. The safer approach: cite the print version even if you read it online, as long as you can verify the pagination matches. The 10th edition print and digital versions share page numbers for the most part. If you do need to cite the online version, copy the URL immediately and screenshot the access page. Technology fails faster than students anticipate.

  

  What the citation doesn't cover

  MLA formatting won't save you if your professor uses a different citation system. Some literature departments at certain universities require Chicago style, some use APA, and a few stubborn professors insist on their own house style. The Norton Anthology official website lists MLA as the default, but that's a suggestion, not a rule. Always check the syllabus first. I've seen students waste entire afternoons reformatting citations only to discover the class required Chicago all along. Another limitation: the 10th edition occasionally renumbers pages between printings. A 2021 printing might differ from a 2022 printing in marginal pagination. If your professor is grading based on an older copy of the anthology, your page numbers might not align. This is rare but it happens. When in doubt, cite the edition year in your Works Cited entry and note any pagination concerns in a brief author's note rather than risking a mismatch.

  Practical workflow that actually works

  Here's the process I settled on after three semesters of this stuff:

  1. Copy the exact title, author, and page range from the anthology before you close the book or tab

     

  2. Open a citation generator (Citation Machine, EasyBib, whatever your program allows) but don't trust it blindly—compare its output against the MLA Handbook 9th edition rules

  3. Verify the anthology editors are listed after "edited by" and not in the author position

  4. Check that the volume number appears after the edition, before the publisher

     

  5. If using the online version, paste the URL and access date, then verify the link still works three days later

  This took me about forty-five seconds per citation once I stopped second-guessing myself. The initial learning curve is steep—maybe twenty minutes per citation the first time—but it stabilizes quickly. Most students spend hours on their Works Cited page because they're formatting piece by piece without a system. That's the real bottleneck, not the rules themselves.

  When to just ask for help

  If you're stuck, the MLA Official Site (mla.org) has a searchable FAQ. The Norton Anthologies support page also answers edition-specific questions. And your professor's teaching assistant is usually more approachable than you think—most TAs have been through this exact confusion and will gently point out where you went wrong without making it a big deal. I avoided asking for help my first semester because I thought it would make me look incompetent. It didn't. The students who asked questions early got better grades, not worse impressions.