The Origin of the Clip
Around 2010 or so, a short interview with Antonio Banderas started circulating online. He was promoting a film — I believe it was Something as Good as Death, though it might have been another project — and when a reporter asked him a question, he responded with something along the lines of "I interview with a vampire." The actual line was almost certainly "I was interviewed by a vampire" or "I did an interview with a vampire," but somewhere in the translation from Spanish or just in the natural cadence of his speech, it came out as "I interview with a vampire." The grammar was slightly off, which is exactly why it blew up. The phrase itself is grammatically awkward. "Interview with" implies you are the one conducting the interview, not the subject of it. That mismatch between what he said and what he clearly meant is the entire joke. It's short enough to repeat, recognizable enough to reference, and the fact that it's a famous actor saying something slightly nonsensical in English made it perfect for the kind of internet humor that thrives on confusion and repetition. It didn't require any deep context. You heard it once, you got it, you shared it. I remember seeing it on a forum around 2011 before it hit YouTube's trending section. Someone posted it with the caption "THIS" and that was it. Within days it was everywhere — GIFs, recontextualized clips, soundboard usage in chat rooms. The clip survived because it's genuinely funny in a mild, harmless way, and because Banderas himself never seemed annoyed by it. He rolled with it, which just added fuel.
Where to Find the Original Clip
The interview exists in multiple uploads across platforms. YouTube has several versions, including some that show more of the surrounding conversation before and after his line. The most-watched versions are usually around 30 to 60 seconds long. If you're looking for the exact moment, it comes roughly halfway through most full-length uploads. There's also a version on Vimeo and a few Reddit threads that host it at original resolution. Search terms that work: the full phrase, plus "Antonio Banderas vampire interview original." Avoid result pages that just link to meme compilations if you want the unedited source. The original interviewer is a woman, and you can see the moment of confusion on her face right after he speaks, which is part of what makes it work.
How It's Used Today
The clip shows up in a few predictable contexts. People drop it into Discord servers when someone claims they "interviewed" something they clearly didn't. It appears in articles about broken English in celebrity interviews. It gets used as a soundbite in podcast intros when the host wants a light laugh. It's also one of those references that people include when they're making a list of "famous awkward celebrity English moments," along with things like Conan O'Brien's Japanese press tour fails or Matt Damon's infamous "I am not a virgin" confusion. The meme lives on because it's lightweight. It doesn't mean anything specific beyond "this person said something slightly wrong in a memorable way." That lack of specific meaning is what keeps it flexible enough to reuse without getting stale. A meme with a deeper punchline usually burns out faster. I've seen this clip referenced in places I didn't expect. A linguistics blog used it as an example of L1-to-L2 transfer errors in Spanish speakers. A comedy writer used it as the opening bit of a set about media training failures. A teacher actually played it in class once when covering how prepositions change meaning in English. None of those uses required understanding anything beyond the surface joke.
Get the Full Details

What Actually Happened in That Interview
From what I've pieced together from watching multiple versions, Banderas was being asked about a scene or a project involving a vampire character. His response was intended to say something like "I did an interview with a vampire" or "I was interviewed alongside the vampire cast member." The exact question isn't crystal clear in every upload since audio quality varies, but the gist is that he was describing a promotional interview related to a vampire role, and his phrasing came out as if he was performing the act of interviewing rather than participating in one. Spanish and English handle this distinction differently. In Spanish, the construction can blur the line between being interviewed and doing an interview more easily than English does. That's a common pattern — it's not unique to Banderas, and it's not something to make a bigger deal out of. Native speakers of many languages make similar preposition slips when speaking English casually.
Common Misinterpretations
Some people treat the clip as proof that Banderas doesn't speak English well. That's not really fair. He's spoken English in interviews before and after this one with no issues. This was one sentence in one casual interview setting, likely filmed under time pressure. Professional actors doing promotional tours go through dozens of these a year, and moments like this happen to everyone. Julia Roberts had her famous "you hit me and then you kiss me" misstatement. Tom Hanks once said something that made no sense in a press junket. These are normal. Another misconception is that the clip is about a vampire movie. Banderas hasn't headlined a major vampire franchise. The reference to a vampire was almost certainly tied to the specific project he was promoting at that press event, not to his career as a whole. Don't go searching for an interview where he's discussing the Twilight series or anything like that. It's not there.
Why This Matters More Than It Should
The clip persisted because it hit the right conditions at the right time. Early YouTube algorithm favorited it. Blogger networks amplified it. It became a shared cultural shorthand that doesn't require explanation anymore. Ten years later, anyone who saw it in 2010 recognizes it instantly and so do most people under 40, even if they've never actually watched the full clip. That kind of longevity is rare for internet humor. Most clips die within a year or two. This one stayed relevant because it's short, harmless, and useful as a reference point. It doesn't depend on current events or trending topics. It works the same way today as it did in 2011. If you want to watch it, pull up any of the YouTube uploads with reasonable view counts. The audio quality differs between them — some are cleaner because they were ripped directly from the broadcast feed, others are compressed through multiple reposts. For a first watch, find the version that shows the interviewer's reaction afterward. That's the part that makes it land.
