Why This Book Matters Right Now
The modern pagan has a straightforward complaint about Christianity: it feels like outdated mythology dressed up in ancient philosophy. Peter Kreeft's Christianity For Modern Pagans is one of the few works that doesn't just respond with theological boilerplate. Instead, he meets the objection on its own terms and walks through the classical arguments without pretending they're new. The result is a text that actually engages the secular mindset rather than preaching at it. Published originally as Jesus Shopping in 1988 and later revised, the book presents the case for Christian faith through a series of structured dialogues between a pagan interlocutor and a Christian guide. Kreeft, who holds the Jack R. Daniel Chair in Philosophy and Theology at Boston College, structures the material around seven fundamental questions: the meaning of life, the existence of God, the problem of suffering, the nature of truth, the question of morality, the reality of death, and the person of Jesus Christ. Each chapter takes a classical philosophical argument and translates it into language a 21st-century reader raised on secular rationalism can actually follow. The format matters here. By using dialogue rather than lecture, Kreeft avoids the trap of presenting Christianity as a system of axioms to accept. The pagan voice raises the real objections — the ones most secular readers actually have — and gets direct answers instead of evasion.
How to Read This Book Effectively
Most people treat this as a casual read and miss half of what it offers. The structure is deceptively simple. Each chapter builds on the previous one in a logical sequence that mirrors the natural progression of philosophical inquiry. If you skip ahead or jump between chapters randomly, you'll lose the scaffolding. Start at the beginning and work through it in order. I ran into a specific issue the first time I used this book with someone skeptical of faith. They got stuck on Chapter 3, which deals with the problem of evil, and treated it as the main argument against Christianity rather than one piece of a larger puzzle. I had them go back to the previous two chapters — the cosmological and moral arguments — and re-read them before returning to the suffering question. The key insight Kreeft is building toward is that the problem of evil actually presupposes an objective moral standard, which in turn presupposes a moral lawgiver. Without that foundation, the objection collapses into subjective preference. Making that connection explicit changed the whole conversation for this person.
The Core Arguments and Where Beginners Go Wrong
Kreeft leans heavily on the Thomistic tradition. If you've never encountered scholastic philosophy, the arguments can feel abstract. The trick is to pay attention to the underlying intuition behind each argument rather than getting bogged down in the formal structure. The transcendental argument for the existence of God is perhaps the most overlooked section in the book. Kreeft argues that meaning, morality, and logic themselves are only intelligible if God exists. A purely materialist worldview cannot account for the very tools — reason, evidence, moral judgment — that the atheist uses to reject Christianity. This is a counter-intuitive point that most secular readers haven't encountered. It's also the one most likely to frustrate someone committed to scientific naturalism because it challenges the assumption that science can ground its own methods without appealing to something beyond itself. Another area where readers often stumble is the chapter on the resurrection. Kreeft doesn't treat this as a supernatural miracle designed to bypass reason. He lays out the historical evidence — the empty tomb, the appearances, the transformation of the disciples, the rise of the early church — and argues that the resurrection is the simplest explanation for the data. Beginners tend to dismiss this by saying "miracles can't be proven historically." Kreeft's response is that we accept miraculous claims in other contexts all the time. If a witness testifies to seeing a crime they wouldn't normally see, we don't automatically dismiss their testimony. The same standard should apply to historical claims about extraordinary events.
Get the Full Details
What the Book Doesn't Address
No single book solves every objection. Christianity For Modern Pagans doesn't engage deeply with contemporary philosophy of religion debates like the evidential problem of evil, the argument from divine hiddenness, or the theological implications of evolutionary biology. If you're familiar with these discussions, you'll notice the gaps. Kreeft is writing for a general audience, not specialists. That's not a flaw in the book, but it's worth knowing before you expect it to address everything. For readers who want more rigorous engagement with those topics, supplementary reading is useful. William Lane Craig's debates on the problem of evil, John Cooper's work on the intermediate state, and N.T. Wright's The Resurrection of the Son of God fill in some of what Kreeft touches on lightly.
Where to Find It
The book is widely available through major retailers. You can find it on Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and Christian book distributors like Faithful Books or Shelfari. It's published by Servant Publications and is also available as an e-book through most digital retailers. If you prefer audiobook format, the Narrated version is available through Audible and Libro.fm. The target audience is clear from the title. If you were raised in a Christian cultural environment and have since rejected faith for secular reasons, this book will feel familiar. If you're coming from a genuinely pagan or non-religious background and want a serious philosophical case for Christianity, this is one of the best entry points available. It doesn't oversimplify. It doesn't talk down. It treats the reader as intelligent and honest. The secular reader who is already convinced they've heard every objection to Christianity may find that Kreeft presents at least one argument they haven't encountered before. That's usually enough to make it worth reading. The dialogue format keeps it accessible without being shallow. And the fact that Kreeft actually addresses the hardest objections rather than sidestepping them gives the book more weight than most apologetics literature.
