Working Through the Key Changes in La La Land's Theme

City Of Stars Piano Sheet Music is available in a handful of key signatures depending on who arranges it, but the vast majority of published versions sit in C major or G major. The original recording by Ryan Gosling is in F major, which is probably the most honest translation if you want the piano part to match what's actually on screen. Most downloadable arrangements skip that and transpose up, which is fine if you're just playing for fun, but it changes the vocal range considerably and makes the thing harder to sing along to. The real difficulty with this piece isn't the melody — it's the left hand. The chord voicings in the first verse are mostly suspended and add9 harmonies that resolve slowly, and beginners tend to flatten them into plain triads because that's what their muscle memory defaults to. When you do that, it loses the whole jazzy quality that makes the song identifiable. The opening bars use Dm7b5, G13, and Cm6 in quick succession before landing on Fmaj7. That Cm6 movement into Fmaj7 is the signature turn-around and it sounds nothing like a standard pop progression. If you're simplifying it, you're basically removing the song.

Where to Find City Of Stars Piano Sheet Music

For legitimate printed arrangements, Hal Leonard publishes a solo piano version that stays close to the film score. It's around $4.99 and covers the main theme, the reprise, and the alternate ending. If you're after something closer to the original orchestration, Justin Hurwitz's published scores through Warner Music Group are the source material, though they run closer to $12 and include brass and string parts. Free transcriptions float around on websites like MuseScore, but the quality is wildly inconsistent. I've seen three different versions of the same four bars with completely different right-hand voicings. The free stuff is fine for practice if you know enough to spot the differences, but I wouldn't trust any unverified transcription for a performance. One thing I ran into recently that took me a while to sort: the 2017 orchestral edition of the sheet music includes a pickup measure at the very beginning of the theme that some arrangements omit entirely. Without that pickup, the downbeat lands on the wrong feel and the whole thing drags. My workaround was to go back to the original soundtrack track and count the rests out loud until I found where beat one actually sits relative to the piano entry. It's an eighth-note rest before the first bar. Marked that directly on my sheet music with a red pen so I don't miss it again. The tempo marking is generally listed as approximately 72 beats per minute, but that's a suggestion, not a rule. The recording itself flexes the tempo quite a bit — it slows on certain phrases and pushes through others. If you're playing strictly at 72 with a metronome, it will sound mechanical. I find it better to learn the phrase-level rubato by ear from the recording first, then apply it. Use the click only for the sections where you need to lock in a consistent groove, like the chorus where the drums come in.

Another thing most people overlook is the dynamics. The sheet music typically marks the opening theme as piano, but the actual emotional contour of the piece demands a much wider range than that single dynamic indication suggests. The first statement should barely project, almost underplayed. Then the second statement, usually after the bridge, steps up to mezzo-piano at least. The final return of the theme after the coda should drift back down to pp or even softer. Without those shifts, it just becomes a pleasant little tune rather than something that actually builds. The score doesn't tell you all of this explicitly, which is typical for film music arrangements. You have to listen to the original and map the dynamics yourself. The bridge section in the original is where the song modulates to A minor briefly before returning. Some arrangements skip the modulation and stay in the home key the whole time. This is one of those cases where the simplified version actually works fine for a beginner because the modulation requires some finger crossings and chord stretches that trip up most players. But if you can handle it, the brief shift to A minor gives the piece its only moment of real tension. Without it, the song never really goes anywhere emotionally. It's just a pleasant loop. Right-hand fingering for the opening melody is fairly standard, but the has some stretches that aren't obvious from the notes on the page. The Fmaj7 chord in the left hand during the verse requires an octave-plus stretch for most adult hands. If you have smaller hands, arpeggiating the chord slightly — letting the lower notes ring while you form the upper extensions — gets you through without breaking the phrase. Don't try to play it block. It won't work and it'll sound clunky. A rolled chord is the accepted approach here and it's what you'll hear in the recording anyway.

Get the Full Details

City Of Stars (from La La Land) by Pasek & Paul Sheet Music for Super Easy Piano at Sheet Music ...
City Of Stars (from La La Land) by Pasek & Paul Sheet Music for Super Easy Piano at Sheet Music ...

If you're preparing this for an audition or a recital, the usual trap is playing it too fast. The tempo feels slow, so there's a tendency to rush through it like it's easy material. It's not. The harmonic movements require clean voice leading and you have to voice every chord properly. A sloppy Fmaj7 that's missing the seventh sounds like a generic pop chord. Add the seventh and you immediately hear the film score quality. The same goes for the ninth on the Dm7 — leave it out and the chord loses its color. It's worth spending ten minutes just practicing the chord transitions in isolation before you even try to play the melody on top. There's also a guitar/vocal arrangement floating around that some pianists try to adapt directly. It's written in drop-D tuning on the guitar and transcribed for piano in a way that doesn't account for the capo placement. The resulting chords look correct on paper but the voicings are completely wrong for piano. I wasted about twenty minutes figuring out why a particular chord shape felt awkward before realizing the transcription had shifted the whole thing up a whole step from the recorded key. Always cross-reference with the original key signature in the published sheet music before committing to a transcription you found online. For practice purposes, I recommend learning the left-hand part separately first, just the chords, no melody. That takes about fifteen minutes if you go measure by measure. Once the left hand is automatic, layer the right hand. The two parts have different rhythmic densities and they fight each other if you try to learn them simultaneously. The left hand moves in longer note values while the right hand is more active with passing tones and appoggiaturas. Your brain will try to sync them before they're ready to sync, which creates frustration and slows down practice significantly.

When you get to the coda, most arrangements cut it short because it's repetitive. The full version loops the final phrase twice with a slight variation on the second pass. The variation is a single note change in the right hand — an E natural instead of an E flat in the third iteration. That one note is what creates the unresolved, ambiguous ending the song is known for. Playing it exactly as written matters more here than anywhere else in the piece because that's the last thing the listener hears. A wrong note at the end ruins the entire impression. If you're looking for something faster to read through, the lead sheet version with just melody and chord symbols is available from several publishers and is fine for casual playing. It won't teach you anything about the arrangement technique or the harmony, but it gets you playing within an hour if you already know basic piano. The full solo piano arrangement is where the actual work is, and that's the one worth investing time in if you're serious about the piece.