Finding John R. Taylor's Classical Mechanics on Reddit
The book you're looking for is "Classical Mechanics" by John R. Taylor. It's widely considered one of the better undergraduate texts for intermediate mechanics, especially if you already know basic calculus and want to move into Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formalism without jumping straight into Goldstein. You'll see it pop up on Reddit fairly regularly, usually in r/AskPhysics or r/PhysicsStudents, sometimes tagged with "need help" or "book recommendation." Most threads about it follow the same pattern. Someone asks for a mechanics book that isn't Kleppner or Marion & Thornton, and Taylor comes up as the middle ground. There's also a subreddit or two where people share solutions, discuss errata, and complain about specific chapters. The chapter on central forces and the orbital mechanics section tend to get the most traffic. The Lagrangian mechanics chapters are where most students actually need help, especially around generalized coordinates and constraints.
Classical Mechanics By John R. Taylor Reddit
When you search for this on Reddit, you'll find discussion threads, not direct download links. Reddit removed a lot of file-sharing content after DMCA enforcement ramped up. What you'll actually find are threads where people talk about which edition to get, whether the solutions manual is worth tracking down, and which chapters cause the most grief. I've seen people post detailed breakdowns of problem 5.4 in chapter 5 about orbital perturbations, and the thread usually goes on for forty or fifty pages with different solution approaches. If someone posts a PDF link in these threads, it gets removed pretty quickly. The standard workaround people use is either checking Library Genesis through a mirror site or asking in the thread if someone can point to a legitimate academic source. Some university libraries have the book available through their online catalog, and a handful of professors post supplementary notes that cover the same material. The second edition from 2005 is the one most people reference. It has revised problems and corrected some of the notation issues from the first edition. Here's a practical problem I ran into last year. I was trying to work through the Euler-Lagrange derivation for a double pendulum in chapter 7, and the textbook's treatment of the constraint forces felt incomplete for what I needed. I posted the specific issue on Reddit and someone pointed me to a set of lecture notes from MIT OpenCourseWare that walked through the same problem with full constraint handling. That ended up being more useful than the book alone. The book gives you the framework but occasionally skips steps that matter when you're actually deriving things yourself rather than just reading passively.
The errata for Taylor's book is mostly the first few editions. If you're working through problems and the numbers seem off, check the published errata page before assuming you made a mistake. There are known typos in problem sets around Chapter 3 and Chapter 8 that can send you down the wrong path for twenty minutes if you catch them late. I once spent an afternoon on problem 8.12 because the printed frequency value in the answer key was wrong by a factor of two. The actual calculation works fine once you notice the typo. One counter-intuitive thing about this book that beginners miss: Taylor introduces energy methods early but delays vector cross products longer than most readers expect. If you're struggling with the angular momentum sections, it's not because the math is harder. It's because he builds up the formalism slowly and assumes you're comfortable with the earlier energy-based derivations. The book works better if you read it sequentially rather than jumping between chapters. The Lagrangian section in particular depends on understanding the action principle from the earlier variational methods chapter. Another pitfall: the problem difficulty is not uniform. Chapter 2 through Chapter 5 have straightforward problems that reinforce the material. Chapter 7 and beyond introduce problems that require synthesizing multiple concepts, and the worked examples in the text sometimes don't cover the full range of approaches you'll need for the harder problems. I'd recommend keeping a separate notebook for derivations rather than trying to work everything directly in the book margins. The problems benefit from space to write out intermediate steps.
Get the Full Details

For people looking for a legitimate copy, the publisher is University Science Books. You can order new copies, used copies, or sometimes find academic discounts through university bookstores. The Kindle version exists but some people report formatting issues with the equations in certain e-reader apps. The paperback holds up reasonably well if you're writing in it, which most students doing this material end up doing anyway. There's also a solutions manual available separately. Whether it's worth it depends on your situation. If you're self-studying, it saves time on checking your work. If you're taking a course, your instructor might already have access to it and the manual could be considered academic integrity territory depending on how your class is structured. I've seen different departments handle this differently, so check with whoever's teaching the course if you're in that position. The Reddit discussions around this book tend to be accurate and helpful compared to many textbook threads. People who know the material post detailed corrections when someone shares a wrong approach, and the community generally discourages just posting full solutions without showing work. That makes it useful even if you're not looking for the book itself. The problem-solving strategies people share in comments often cover edge cases the textbook doesn't explicitly address, like handling non-holonomic constraints or dealing with time-dependent potentials in Lagrangian problems.