Working With the Doctor Faustus A Text: A Practical Guide
The 1604 quarto is the earliest printed version of Marlowe's Doctor Faustus, and it's the one most people encounter in undergraduate courses. It differs from the 1616 B text in ways that matter for performance, interpretation, and citation. I spent several semesters teaching from this version and editing a performance-ready script based on it, so I've run into the same pile of problems multiple times. The A text is shorter, roughly 1,500 lines compared to the B text's 1,700-plus. It has a cleaner dramatic arc, fewer comic scenes, and notably different stage directions. The difference is probably in the ending: the A text's final scene is tighter and more abrupt, with less of the mechanical spectacle that gets added in later versions. For anyone doing close reading or production work, this isn't just a trivia point. It changes how the play lands dramatically. Here's the thing most intro lit courses don't stress enough: the A text is probably closer to what was actually performed in Marlowe's lifetime. The B text appears to have been revised, possibly by someone other than Marlowe, with additions that reflect later theatrical tastes. That doesn't automatically make the A text "better," but it does mean you should know which one you're working with before you cite it or direct it.
I once spent a full day trying to reconcile a line reading between the two texts, only to realize I'd been mixing them in my notes without tracking it. The play's famous "Will you be made a fine man?" speech exists in different forms across the versions. Always note your base text explicitly in any work you produce, because switching between them mid-analysis produces half-baked arguments that fall apart under even basic scrutiny.
How to Actually Use the A Text for Analysis
Start by getting a clean modern edition that presents the A text faithfully. The Norton Anthology of Drama and the Arden Early Modern Drama series both do this adequately. Some editions try to blend the two texts, which defeats the purpose if you're doing text-specific work. Check the editor's introduction for their textual rationale. If they won't tell you what base manuscript or quarto they're using, don't trust the edition for serious study. The A text's stages directions are sparse but consequential. When it says Faustus summons Helen of Troy, the direction is functional rather than elaborate. The B text adds more atmospheric business around the same moments. If you're analyzing how the play constructs spectacle versus text, this disparity is your primary evidence. Don't just note the difference, trace how it affects audience experience across scenes. One specific problem I hit regularly: citation confusion. Scholars will reference a line number from the B text without stating it, and you end up cross-referencing against the A text and finding nothing at that location. Always double-check line numbers against your specific edition's numbering system. Different publishers paginate differently, and the line counts diverge between texts anyway.
Get the Full Details
Common Pitfalls When Working With This Version
The biggest mistake I see students make is assuming the A text represents Marlowe's final intentions. We don't know that. It's the earliest printed version, but it may have been edited by someone in the printing house before publication. The title page credits no editor, and the text shows signs of possible memorial reconstruction in places. Treat it as a performance document from around 1604 rather than an authorial manuscript. Another trap is ignoring the comic scenes. The A text retains some of them, and they're not filler. The mechanic scenes provide structural counterpoint to Faustus's elevation and fall. Cutting them for pacing, which directors sometimes do, removes the play's own commentary on the relationship between learned ambition and manual labor. You'll produce a cleaner drama but a thinner one. I encountered a real issue when preparing a classroom performance of the A text. The character of Lucifer appears in several scenes in the B text but is significantly reduced in the A version. A student director wanted to restore Lucifer appearances for dramatic clarity. I argued against it, not because the B text was wrong, but because restoring those scenes fundamentally changes the A text's theological architecture. In the A text, Faustus's isolation is more complete, and that's the point. The workaround was keeping Lucifer out but adding a staging note that Faustus is increasingly alone on stage as the play progresses, which communicates the same thematic concern without imposing the B text's structure onto it.
Where the A Text Falls Short
The A text isn't universally preferable. It has textual corruptions and possible printing errors that aren't always easy to identify. The B text preserves some readings that scholars consider more authoritative at specific passages. If you're doing serious textual criticism, you can't rely on the A text alone. You need a parallel reading or a variorum edition that notes significant variant readings between the two quartos. For performance purposes, the A text's brevity is usually an advantage but not always. The compressed ending can feel abrupt to audiences expecting a more drawn-out confrontation. Some productions of the A text add a brief final moment of silence or a modified exit to ease the transition. This is a legitimate directorial choice, but it should be noted as an intervention, not presented as the text itself. If you need a version with extensive scholarly apparatus and detailed notes on every variant reading, look into the Revels or Oxford English Drama editions rather than relying on a standard student paperback. The A text rewards careful attention, but it also requires the right tools to interrogate it properly.
Practical Steps for Getting Started
Download or purchase a copy of the 1604 quarto facsimile if your project demands it. The English Short Title Catalogue and the Folger Shakespeare Library's digital collections both offer free access to digitized copies. Reading the original quarto directly is tedious but illuminating. You'll notice spelling conventions, punctuation choices, and typo patterns that modern editions smooth over. Those rough edges contain information about how the text was handled in its original printing environment. For most people, a reliable modern edition with the A text as the base is sufficient. Read it through once without annotations, then read it again with critical notes. The differences between what the play says and what critics say about what it says will become obvious quickly, and that distance is where your own analysis lives.
