How to Actually Use Figurative Language Coloring Sheets in Your Classroom
I have been using these for about seven years across different grade levels, and they work better than most people give them credit for when you understand what they are and where they fall apart. These are essentially line-art worksheets where students identify metaphors, similes, personification, hyperbole, alliteration, onomatopoeia, and idioms embedded in passages or images, then color corresponding sections based on their answers. The mechanic sounds simple enough that it barely warrants explanation, but the execution is where things get messy. The basic workflow goes like this: you distribute a sheet, students read the text or examine the image prompts, match each figurative device to its correct category, and color according to a key you provide or that is already printed on the sheet. When done right, it takes about twenty minutes for a standard class period. The coloring acts as both a verification mechanism and a low-stakes engagement tool, which is why so many teachers reach for them when they need something to fill time without completely losing the room.
I should be honest about the main problem I run into. About three years ago I tried using a particular set of Figurative Language Coloring Sheets with seventh graders where the answer key had overlapping categories for certain examples. A single sentence could legitimately be classified as both personification and metaphor depending on how you read it, and the sheet only allowed for one color per section. Half the class ended up confused, some thought they were doing it wrong, and I spent the last ten minutes of class re-teaching the distinction between those two devices just to clear up the confusion. My workaround was to print a second sheet with clarifying examples on the back and hold a quick fifteen-minute review before they started coloring. Since then I always preview these materials before handing them out, and I flag any ambiguous examples on the board so students know what to do when a passage doesn't fit neatly into one box. There is a counter-intuitive thing most teachers miss about these resources. They are not primarily assessment tools. The coloring portion makes the actual answers visible at a glance, which sounds like it should function as a grading mechanism, but the visual reveal of a completed sheet tells you very little about whether a student actually understood the material. You can color every section correctly by guessing or pattern-matching without knowing the difference between an idiom and hyperbole. I stopped using the finished sheets as any kind of formal evaluation and started having students underline the actual text evidence in a separate notebook, which gave me far more useful information about their comprehension in roughly the same amount of time. Another nuance that trips people up involves the difficulty level of the passages themselves. Many commercially available Figurative Language Coloring Sheets use language that is well below grade level in terms of reading complexity, even though the figurative devices they target are appropriately challenging. A student might decode a fifth-grade reading level passage without effort but still struggle to identify alliteration versus assonance because those are phonological awareness skills that require separate instruction. I found this out the hard way when a group of strong readers breezed through the text and then couldn't distinguish between two nearly identical sounding devices on the answer sheet. The fix was pairing the coloring activity with a brief direct instruction segment beforehand, which added about eight minutes to the lesson but dramatically improved accuracy rates.
Where these sheets genuinely fail is with students who have fine motor difficulties or visual processing issues. The coloring requirement itself becomes a barrier for some kids, and the small print on certain commercial versions is genuinely illegible for students with mild vision problems. I have one student who consistently performed well on figurative language assessments but would never finish a coloring sheet because the crossing-hatching technique required for certain sections was physically exhausting for her. For that student, I printed the same content as a regular worksheet where she could just write her answers, and she scored higher on the follow-up quiz than she ever did with the colored version. If your class has any students with similar accommodations, skip the coloring format entirely and use the underlying questions as a standard worksheet. You can find downloadable sets on Teachers Pay Teachers, Share My Lesson, and various educational Pinterest boards. Search for "figurative language coloring page PDF" or "figurative language coloring sheets free" and you will get dozens of results, but the quality varies enormously. The free options tend to have formatting issues, inconsistent answer keys, and passages that aren't original content. The paid versions from established creators are usually more polished but cost between three and eight dollars per set, which adds up if you go through multiple packets per semester. The ones I end up coming back to are the sets that include both a student-facing sheet and a teacher answer key with the specific textual evidence highlighted. That last detail matters more than it should because it saves you from having to re-read every passage yourself when you are trying to grade or review with a student who got a question wrong.
Get the Full Details
If you want to make your own, the simplest approach is taking passages you already use in literature instruction, pulling out the figurative language examples, and laying them over a relevant line drawing. I typically use a free vector art site for the base images and paste the text boxes directly onto them in Google Slides before exporting to PDF. This takes about twenty minutes per custom sheet but ensures the passages match your curriculum exactly, which the off-the-shelf products rarely do. The bottom line is that Figurative Language Coloring Sheets are a reasonable activity for reinforcing recognition skills when used alongside proper instruction and when you pair them with a separate comprehension check. They are not a substitute for teaching, they are not a reliable grading mechanism, and they do not work for every student in your room. Treat them like what they are, which is a structured practice exercise with a built-in self-check feature, and they will serve you adequately.
