Mathews Has Been Around Longer Than Most Hunters Realize
The company was founded in 1988 by Mike Domske out of his garage in St. Paul, Minnesota. He had been working in the archery industry since the mid-1970s, mainly on the manufacturing side, and he got tired of watching companies cut corners on quality. The first Mathews bow was the Z9, and it already showed the pattern that would define the brand: obsess over small details that other makers ignored. Cam design, string material, brace height tuning — all of it got more attention than it usually did at that price point. The 1990s were the growth years. Mathews introduced the Delta cam system, which was basically their answer to the inconsistent let-off and hand shock that plagued early compound bows. The cam profile was asymmetric, meaning the draw cycle felt smoother and the bow sat quieter at full draw. That asymmetry became a signature. Other companies copied elements of it over the next decade because it actually worked. By the mid-2000s, Mathews had established itself as a premium brand. The TruGlide cam system came out around 2006 and reduced friction on the cables significantly. I remember shooting a dealer demo unit of the Kite back then and immediately noticing how much less vibration there was compared to my old bow. The finish on the limbs was better too — they started using more durable coatings because bows kept getting scratched up in the field and the old finishes would chip within a season.
The biggest shift happened with the BINAR system, introduced around 2015. This was their answer to the inherent torque problem in traditional cam bows. Instead of one cam on each side connected by cables, BINAR used a single loop of string that ran through a central track. The result was a bow that stayed square at full draw no matter how you held it. I had a friend who switched from a conventional compound to a BINARbow specifically because he had grip torque issues that were costing him consistency. He dropped his group size by about forty percent within three months. Not every archer needed that, but for people who struggled with form, it was transformative. Mathews also went through an ownership change. In 2014, they were acquired by Cabela's, which gave them broader distribution but also raised some eyebrows in the archery community about whether independence would suffer. The acquisition didn't really change the engineering — the same team kept running R&D — but it did make their bows available in more retail locations. Before that, you often had to go to a specialty shop. Now they're everywhere, which is good for availability and bad for the boutique feel they used to have. In 2019, they made another pivot. They went flat-string on their adult models, dropping the traditional parallel string setup. The flat string reduces peak force and makes the draw cycle smoother. Some longtime Mathews shooters hated it at first. They were used to the feel of the dual-string setup and didn't trust the new configuration. But after a few months, most of them admitted the flat string felt better and the bows shot quieter. A vocal minority stuck with their old bows or switched brands, but the shift stuck.
The current lineup includes models like the Nitro, Triax, V3X, and the entry-level Takk and Takedown series. The Nitro is their high-end recurve-style compound, the Triax targets the mid-market, and the Takk is their budget-friendly option. Each one carries forward the core design philosophy — cam efficiency, smooth draw cycles, and minimal vibration — but at different price points.
Get the Full Details
What Actually Makes These Bows Different
The cam systems are the main thing. Mathews has consistently pushed cam design forward. The ICS (Inverse Cam System) on some of their earlier bows was interesting — it reversed the traditional cam geometry to reduce peak draw weight while maintaining holding weight. It's not something you see from other manufacturers because it requires more precise manufacturing tolerances. Their use of aluminum risers is another differentiator. Most bow companies use magnesium or composite materials for the riser. Mathews stuck with aluminum because it machines cleaner and holds adjustments better over time. I've seen bows from other brands where the axle screws stripped out after a few years of use. With Mathews, that's rare because the aluminum is harder and the threading is more robust. One thing people don't talk about enough is their brace height options. Mathews bows are designed to be adjustable across a range of brace heights, and they publish those ranges clearly. Most companies will tell you the factory setting and leave it at that. If you want to experiment with higher or lower brace heights for your setup, Mathews gives you the information to do it safely. I've adjusted my own bows based on that guidance — dropping brace height about half an inch from stock reduced noise noticeably without sacrificing arrow flight stability.
There are downsides. Mathews bows are expensive. You're paying a premium over comparable bows from other brands, and sometimes that premium is significant. A Nitro will set you back well over a thousand dollars just for the bow. The BINAR system, while innovative, is harder to service. If something breaks on a BINARbow, you often need a certified technician because the string track system isn't something a typical archery shop knows how to handle. I had a cable fail on a BINARunit once and it took two weeks to get it sorted because only a handful of shops in the region were trained on that system. Another issue is parts availability. Because Mathews changes model lines frequently, older bows can go out of parts support sooner than you'd expect. I had a customer with a TruGlide bow from around 2008 who couldn't find replacement cams. Mathews had moved on to newer designs and stopped producing the older ones. He ended up having to buy a used bow for parts just to keep his shooting. It's not unique to Mathews — most bow companies do this — but it hits harder when you've invested in a premium bow.
Where They Fit in the Market
Mathews occupies the upper end of the compound bow market. They compete with brands like Easton, Bowtech, and Hoyt in terms of performance. Where they differentiate is in the draw cycle smoothness. Their cams are engineered to minimize the wall feel at full draw, which matters if you're holding steady for extended periods. That's why they're popular with competitive archers and serious hunters who need a quiet, smooth draw. For beginners, a Mathews might be overkill. The Takk and Takedown series are more appropriate entry points, but even those are priced higher than comparable offerings from Easton or PSE. If you're just starting out and aren't sure you'll stick with it, a mid-range bow from another brand makes more financial sense. Mathews bows hold their value reasonably well though, so if you decide archery isn't for you, you can usually resell without taking a massive hit. The brand has a strong following in the hunting community. Their bows are quiet enough for close-range deer hunting without spooking game, and the draw weight ranges cover everything from lightweight women's models to heavy backcountry setups. The V3X, for example, offers a wide draw weight range and adjustable draw length, which makes it a solid choice for someone who wants one bow to handle multiple scenarios.
If you want to learn more about the full history and specific model evolution, the Mathews website has a product archive section and there are archived discussions on archery forums that document the changes year by year. The subreddit r/archery has some older threads from the early 2010s that discuss the transition away from parallel strings, and they're worth reading if you're trying to understand how the company's design philosophy shifted over time.
