How to Navigate Publishing With Journal Of The European Society Of Medicine
I have spent years dealing with various open access and traditional journals across Europe, and journal Of The European Society Of Medicine is one that comes up more often than most people realize. It is an open access, peer reviewed publication that covers clinical medicine, public health, and applied research. If you are thinking about submitting there or working with an article they have published, here is what actually happens. It operates under an open access model, which means authors typically pay an article processing charge unless their institution has a waiver or transformative agreement in place. The journal accepts original research, reviews, case reports, and short communications. It is indexed in several databases including Scopus and PubMed Central, though indexing status can shift, so always verify before you count it toward your institutional requirements. The review timeline is not fixed. From my experience, most submissions go through a standard blind peer review process that takes anywhere from six to twelve weeks. Some manuscripts move faster if they fall into a section with fewer submissions, but that is more luck than strategy.
Submitting Your Manuscript
Before you upload anything, check their current author guidelines on the official site. They change periodically and the last time I caught someone citing the old version in their cover letter was embarrassing for everyone involved. The journal uses an online submission system, usually something like ScholarOne or a similar platform. You will create an account, fill in the required metadata, and upload your manuscript files separately from your supporting documents. Here is a specific problem I ran into that took me a while to solve. I submitted a manuscript where the institutional affiliation format did not match what the journal required. The system accepted it without flagging an error, but the production team sent it back during the formatting stage, which delayed publication by three weeks. The workaround was simple once I knew it: before submitting, go to the journal homepage and look at the most recently published article. Copy their exact affiliation format, including how they handle joint appointments and department ordering. Use that as your template rather than your university's default format generator.
What to Expect After Submission
After submission you will receive a confirmation email and a manuscript ID. The editorial office does a preliminary check for scope and basic formatting before sending it out for review. This preliminary filter catches about a third of submissions on structure alone, mostly missing sections, incorrect reference format, or figures that do not meet resolution requirements. When the reviews come back, the editor makes one of three decisions: accept, minor revision, or major revision. Rejection without revision is possible but less common for work that clearly falls within their scope and meets basic quality thresholds. If you get a revision request, read every reviewer comment carefully. The ones that say "clarify" or "expand" usually mean the reviewer found a genuine gap, not that they are being difficult. I once spent two days responding point by point to a minor revision request, only to realize the editor had already accepted the paper conditionally. Good responses still matter, but do not overextend yourself on revision rounds that are unlikely to change the outcome.
Get the Full Details
Open Access Fees and Payment
The article processing charge for journal Of The European Society Of Medicine is competitive compared to other fully open access medical journals. As of my last check, it falls in a reasonable range for the field, though I always recommend confirming the current fee directly on their website since these change. Payment is typically required before publication, and some institutions cover this through their library agreements. If cost is a concern, look into whether your country or institution qualifies for a discount or waiver. Several European research councils and library consortia have negotiated agreements that reduce or eliminate the fee for affiliated authors. This is not always advertised prominently, so email the editorial office and ask. A straightforward message explaining your situation usually gets a useful response within a few business days.
Common Pitfalls That Slow Everything Down
Reference formatting is the biggest source of delays. The journal uses Vancouver style, which means numbered citations in the order they appear in the text. Many authors copy references from PubMed and paste them directly without checking that the output matches the journal's specific format. A single incorrect punctuation mark or missing journal abbreviation can trigger a formatting rejection that adds days to your timeline. Another issue I see repeatedly is ethical approval documentation. If your study involves human participants, the journal expects a statement about ethics committee approval and informed consent in the methods section, along with the approval number. Missing this means the paper goes back before it even reaches reviewers. Keep these documents ready in a separate folder before you start writing, not after you have finished. Figures also cause problems. The journal requires high resolution, usually at least 300 DPI for photographs and 600 DPI for graphs and charts. Files need to be submitted as separate images, not embedded in the Word document. I once saw a submission rejected on this basis alone because the author had pasted all figures into the main manuscript file and assumed the system would handle them. It does not. Submit them individually through the portal.
Revisions and Resubmission
When you revise, include a response document that addresses every comment from the reviewers and the editor. Number your responses to match theirs. Be polite even when you disagree with a suggestion. You do not need to implement every change, but you do need to explain why you chose not to in a professional tone. If your revision is still not accepted, you can usually resubmit within a set timeframe without losing your original manuscript ID. Check the editor's letter for the deadline. Missing it means starting over, which resets your place in the queue entirely.
After Acceptance
Once accepted, you will receive proofs to check. These are your last chance to catch errors before publication. Review them carefully, especially author names, affiliations, funding statements, and figure labels. Corrections at this stage are limited to factual errors, not stylistic preferences. If you try to rewrite paragraphs during proof review, the production team will likely reject the changes and send you back to the editor. After publication, your article is freely available online under the journal's open access license. Make sure you save the final published PDF for your records and for sharing with colleagues. Some authors wait too long to request a copy and then struggle to find it later when they need it for a CV or promotion file. The journal is a solid option for researchers who need open access dissemination and do not want to navigate subscription paywalls. It is not the fastest journal in the field, and the formatting requirements are strict enough that rushing your submission will cost you time. Plan ahead, follow the guidelines precisely, and keep your documentation organized from day one.
