A Practical Look At The Irena Sendler Educational Project

Life In A Jar The Irena Sendler Project is a theatrical and educational resource based on the true story of Irena Sendler, the Polish welfare worker who smuggled roughly 2,500 Jewish children out of the Warsaw Ghetto during World War II. It is not a documentary film, a textbook, or a standalone app. It is a stage play with educational materials attached, commonly used in schools across North America and parts of Europe. I have dealt with this material in multiple settings — both as someone who studied it and later as someone who helped coordinate school productions and workshops around it. The core premise is straightforward enough. Sendler hid children's identities in jars buried under an apple tree, wrote down their real names on strips of paper inside glass jars, and arranged for them to be placed with hiding families, in orphanages, and with the Polish underground. After the war, she tried to reunite the children with surviving relatives.

Life In A Jar The Irena Sendler Project

The play itself runs roughly two hours with a break. It was written by Megan McIvor, Susan Slesinger, and Marsha Skrypuch. The script is available through several educational performance rights organizations. Most schools and community groups obtain it through Music Theatrical Publishing or similar licensing bodies. You do not need a Broadway-level budget to stage it. The technical requirements are modest — basic lighting, a few props, and a cast that can range from about twelve to twenty performers depending on how you cut it. The educational side is where the project really exists. There are curriculum guides, discussion questions, historical background packets, and activity sheets designed to accompany the play. These are aimed at middle school and high school students. The material covers the Holocaust, Polish resistance, child survival, moral courage, and memory work. It is not designed as a comprehensive history course on its own. You will need to supplement it. Here is the thing most people do not tell you about using this in a classroom or production setting. The emotional weight of the subject matter hits harder than the dramatic structure of the play. Students tend to remember the personal stories — the children, the betrayals, the narrow escapes — far more than the broader historical context the curriculum tries to provide. I watched a group of fourteen-year-olds sit in silence after the final scene for a full four minutes. No one wanted to discuss it right away. That is normal. Build in processing time. Do not jump straight into a worksheet after the performance or rehearsal.

The curriculum guides are decent but uneven. Some sections are well-researched with primary source references. Others feel thin, especially where they cover the postwar period. Sendler was essentially forgotten for decades after the war, only being widely recognized again in the 1980s and 1990s. The play compresses this timeline considerably, and the educational materials sometimes follow the same compressed version. If you are teaching this, I would pair it with Deborah Lipstadt or Jan Grabowski for deeper historical context, and maybe something like The Girl from the Warsaw Ghetto by Zonia Baber for the child's perspective. I ran into a specific problem once that I do not think the official materials address directly. A student in our production was the grandchild of a Holocaust survivor who had actually been hidden during the war. The material was triggering for her in ways the facilitators were not prepared for. We had to pause the rehearsal schedule, bring in a counselor, and restructure how we approached certain scenes. The licensed curriculum does mention sensitivity concerns briefly, but it does not give you a real protocol. If you are running this with students who have personal family connections to the period, you need your own plan. Talk to your school counselor beforehand. Ask students privately if they have any personal connections to the subject matter. It takes about ten minutes and it prevents real damage. On the production side, here is what actually works. You do not need elaborate sets. The play moves through time and location constantly. A few tables, some chairs, and a few carefully chosen props carry the scenes. I have seen schools use a single large wooden crate as a central piece that becomes a table, a box, a hiding place, whatever the scene requires. Lighting does the rest. Keep it simple. The script calls for some scene transitions that are harder than they appear on paper. Rehearse the transitions separately before you worry about blocking everything else. A lot of groups rush into actor work and then spend three weeks figuring out how people get from one scene to the next.

Get the Full Details

Life in a Jar: The Irena Sendler Project | Lowell Milken Center
Life in a Jar: The Irena Sendler Project | Lowell Milken Center

The music in the production is minimal. There is no score to speak of beyond occasional vocal moments. This is actually an advantage if you are working with a school that does not have a strong music program. You are not dependent on finding musicians or learning complex arrangements. The emotional impact comes from the text and the acting. One counter-intuitive point about casting. Do not assign the role of Irena Sendler to your most experienced actor automatically. Sendler is not the dramatic center of this story in the way you might expect. The children carry the emotional arc. The role of the children, particularly the younger ones, demands more authenticity and less technique. Give the lead child roles to performers who can be vulnerable and real. Sendler herself is played with restraint throughout most of the play. She is not a theatrical showboat role. She is patient, methodical, quietly exhausted. A subdued performance works better than a big one. The licensing cost is another practical concern. Depending on your region and the size of your production, rights can run anywhere from a few hundred to over a thousand dollars. Educational discounts exist but you have to apply for them and they are not automatic. Factor this into your budget early. Some groups have reported success contacting the playwrights directly for school discounts outside the standard licensing channels. It is worth a try, though there is no guarantee.

Here is a limitation that deserves attention. The play takes some dramatic liberties. It is not a documentary record. Certain characters are composites. Some timelines are compressed. If you are using this in an academic history course rather than a theater or humanities elective, you need to be explicit with your students about what is dramatized and what is documented. Do not present the play as a primary source. It is not. It is a dramatic interpretation based on historical research. There is a difference, and your students will notice if you do not point it out. The digital resources around this project are scattered. There is no single official website that houses everything. The playwrights have a presence on social media. The curriculum materials are distributed through the licensing organizations. Some schools and museums have created their own supplemental resources. If you are building a unit around this, you will spend time hunting for materials. That is just part of the process. I keep a folder of PDFs and links that I have collected over the years. It saves time on future runs. If your goal is purely educational and you do not need a full production, there are alternatives. Documentaries like Irena Sendler: To Save a Thousand Children exist. Reading groups focused on Sendler's biography, such as the one by Esther K. Hughes, work well for older students. The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum has online resources that complement the themes. But if you want something that makes the history personal and immediate, the play format is harder to beat. It is the reason the project has stayed in print and in schools for so long.