Organizing a Complete List Of Pixar Films
Pixar has been releasing feature films since 1995, and keeping a clean, accurate record of them is more involved than it looks on the surface. There are twenty-six theatrical feature films in the official roster, plus a handful of direct-to-video and shorts that some lists include and others don't. The core problem most people hit is figuring out what counts as a Pixar film, where to draw the line on spinoffs, and how to handle release date discrepancies across regions. Here is how I approach building a working list, based on actually maintaining one for years.
Getting The List Of Pixar Films Right
The first step is locking down your inclusion criteria. The standard approach is feature-length theatrical releases produced by Pixar Animation Studios and distributed by Walt Disney Pictures. That gives you the twenty-six titles from Toy Story through Lightyear. If you include direct-to-video projects, you add Pixar's Short Films Collection volumes and the Cars Toons, Planes shorts, and the Oddballs compilation. I tend to keep those in a separate section rather than blending them in, because the metadata behaves differently and people asking for the main list usually want the theatrical run. The complete theatrical lineup in release order: 1. Toy Story (1995)
2. A Bug's Life (1998) 3. Toy Story 2 (1999) 4. Monsters, Inc. (2001)
Get the Full Details
5. Finding Nemo (2003) 6. The Incredibles (2004) 7. Cars (2006)
8. Ratatouille (2007) 9. WALL-E (2008) 10. Up (2009)
11. Toy Story 3 (2010) 12. Cars 2 (2011) 13. Brave (2012)
14. Monsters University (2013) 15. Inside Out (2015) 16. The Good Dinosaur (2015)
17. Finding Dory (2016) 18. Cars 3 (2017) 19. Incredibles 2 (2018)
20. Toy Story 4 (2019) 21. Onward (2020) 22. Soul (2020)
23. Luca (2021) 24. Turning Red (2022) 25. Lightyear (2022)
26. Elemental (2023) 27. Inside Out 2 (2024) I have seen several published lists that miscount here because they include or exclude titles inconsistently. The most common mistake is dropping The Good Dinosaur. It underperformed, which is why it gets omitted from casual roundups, but it is absolutely a Pixar theatrical feature. Another frequent error is treating Soul and Luca as non-Pixar releases because they premiered on streaming, but they were produced by Pixar and carry Pixar production credits. If you are building a database, flag them with their Disney+ premiere date alongside the theatrical window rather than classifying them as something else.
The Metadata Problem Most People Ignore
Getting the titles right is only half the work. The real friction is in the supporting data: directors, runtime, box office, and certification. Runtime varies depending on whether you count pre-show cartoons in theaters, especially for the older titles where the Cars Toons and One Man Band shorts played before the feature in select markets. I standardize on the theatrical cut runtime listed in the studio's own press materials, which tends to match what you see on DVD and Blu-ray. Streaming versions sometimes carry slightly different timings due to encoding artifacts, so I do not trust those numbers. For the director field, I track the primary director rather than co-directors unless both share equal billing. For example, Pete Docter directed Up alongside Bob Peterson as co-director, but most authoritative sources list Docter as the sole director. This inconsistency shows up constantly when you scrape data from multiple databases. I resolved it by using the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences registry as my source of record, cross-referencing with the Annie Award nominations to catch any co-director credits the studio itself acknowledges. It added maybe twenty minutes to my data-gathering process but eliminated about eighty percent of the correction tickets I used to get. Box office figures are another minefield. Many lists I have seen pull from Box Office Mojo without accounting for re-releases. Toy Story had multiple reissues, and finding its total gross requires adding the original run plus each subsequent re-release. I maintain a separate column for original theatrical gross versus cumulative gross so the distinction stays clear. The same issue affects Up and Toy Story 3, both of which received substantial anniversary re-releases in Asian markets.
Edge Cases That Break Simple Lists
Brave is probably the most contentious title on any Pixar list. It was produced by Pixar but directed by Mark Andrews and Brenda Chapman, and its Celtic setting and story feel closer to a traditional fairy tale than the tech-driven narratives Pixar is known for. Some curators exclude it under the logic that it "does not fit the brand." I include it because it is a Pixar production through and through, carries Pixar production code, and was released under the Pixar banner with Jim Morris as producer. Excluding Brave creates a gap that forces you to explain why one film is in while another equally outside-the-norm film like Soul stays, and the logic does not hold up consistently. Another problematic area is spinoff classification. Lightyear is a film within the Toy Story universe but functions as a standalone narrative about the character Buzz Lightyear inspired by the toy line. It is classified as a Pixar film. The Incredibles 2 is a direct sequel, also Pixar. If your list structure has a "sequels" section, you need to decide whether to separate sequels from standalone originals. I keep them mixed in chronological order and add a tag or column for sequel status. It is cleaner than maintaining two parallel lists that inevitably drift out of sync. WALL-E has an unusual metadata quirk: the first thirty minutes contain almost no dialogue. When I built a search index for the list, some filtering scripts expected dialogue presence and skipped the file entirely. I solved this by adding a content notes field that flags non-standard runtime composition rather than trying to force it into a dialogue-based category. It took about an hour to restructure the field definitions, but after that the index worked across all twenty-seven entries without further issues.
Pitfalls With Public Data Sources
If you pull from Wikipedia, expect to verify dates manually. Release dates differ between festival premieres, limited releases, and wide releases. Finding Nemo premiered at Cannes in May 2003 but had its wide theatrical release in June. Inside Out and The Good Dinosaur both released in 2015, which confuses sorting algorithms that rely on year alone. You need month and day precision if you want accurate chronological ordering. IMDb tends to conflate production companies and distributors. They list Disney as the production company for several Pixar titles when technically Pixar Animation Studios is the production entity and Disney is the distributor. If you are structuring data for internal use, this distinction matters for rights and licensing queries. The MPAA rating field also has inconsistencies around G versus PG designations for international versions, which I flag with a notes column noting the rating variance by region. The most reliable single source for baseline data is the Pixar official website and the Disney corporate archives. They maintain production timelines, director credits, and technical specifications that are accurate to the studio's own records. I still cross-check against the Annie Awards database and the Academy's official records for editorial and music credits, but the Pixar site is my primary anchor point.
How I Structure My Working List
I use a flat CSV file with these columns: release date (YYYY-MM-DD), title, director, co-director, producer, runtime minutes, MPAA rating, production budget, domestic box office, international box office, worldwide box office, MPAA summary, and notes. The notes column catches everything from re-release gross adjustments to classification edge cases. I update it quarterly and keep a change log at the top of the file documenting what was modified and why. This has saved me from re-deriving answers when questions come up about why a particular entry looks a certain way. For public distribution, I export to JSON and serve it through a simple API endpoint. The JSON structure mirrors the CSV columns and adds a thumbnail_url field pointing to the official poster artwork. I cache the response for twenty-four hours to avoid hammering the image hosting service. The endpoint returns all entries sorted by release date descending, which is the format most consumers expect, but I also serve a version sorted by title for alphabetical lookup. If you are building something smaller, a Google Sheet works fine. I recommend it over a spreadsheet app that auto-formats dates because Excel has historically mangled MM-DD-YYYY and DD-MM-YYYY interpretations depending on regional settings. Google Sheets is more forgiving, though it still trips up occasionally on ambiguous dates like 04/07/2012. I lock the date column to text format during initial data entry to prevent this.
What This List Misses
Even a thoroughly maintained list of Pixar films has blind spots. The list does not capture short films with meaningful narrative connections to the features. Partly Cloudy appears before Up and establishes the rain concept, but including every short would expand the list dramatically and dilute its utility. I keep a separate document for shorts and link to it when someone asks about pre-show content. The list also does not reflect Pixar's television work. Finest Friends, Lamp Life, and the various Disney Channel shorts are Pixar productions but fall outside the theatrical feature definition. If your audience includes people who want comprehensive Pixar output, you need a second list or a tagged system that distinguishes theatrical features from other production categories. I tried merging them once and the data became unmanageable within six months because the metadata schemas for features and shorts are fundamentally different. There is also the question of what happens with the upcoming films. As of my last update, the next Pixar theatrical release schedule extends into 2026 with at least three titles in development, including a continuation of the Elemental franchise and a project based on the game Stray. I do not include titles without confirmed release dates because premature entries create more cleanup work than they save. The standard practice is to hold a placeholder row with the status field marked as announced and leave the remaining fields blank until the studio confirms the date and credits.
Building a clean List Of Pixar Films takes more effort than copying a Wikipedia table, but the payoff is a dataset you can actually trust when questions come up about edge cases, sequencing, and classification. The ones who skip the verification step end up with lists that look correct until someone asks about WALL-E's runtime or why Brave is missing, and then they spend a weekend fixing inconsistencies they could have avoided upfront.
