Getting Started with the Modeling Workshop Materials
The Modeling Workshop Project materials from around 2006 are still circulating among physics educators who want to actually shift how they teach mechanics. I spent about two summers going through the full workshop sequence, and honestly, most people grab the wrong files first and get stuck. Here is what you need to know before you start. The "Time for Physics First" workshop packet was designed for teachers transitioning into the Physics First curriculum track. It covers the core modeling cycle — representation, analysis, prediction, evaluation — but it assumes you already have some familiarity with the basic model toolbox. If you have never used position-time graphs as a primary representational tool before, you will struggle with the pacing. The workshop moves quickly past the basics into multi-representational reasoning, and it expects participants to be comfortable switching between graphical, verbal, mathematical, and diagrammatic forms on the fly. I ran into a specific problem during my first attempt at the dynamics module. The materials reference a particular set of force diagrams from the earlier "Motion Model" workshop, but if you are only getting the Physics First packet, those foundational slides are not included. You will hit a wall around Week 3 when they start doing free-body diagram analysis on inclined planes with friction without building up the representational scaffolding first. What I ended up doing was pulling the Motion Model teacher manual from the same project and using it as a prerequisite reading. Took about an extra week of prep, but it saved me from having to slow down my class repeatedly.
One thing the workshop materials don't emphasize enough is the role of computer tools. The 2006 version assumes access to Vernier or PASCO probe equipment and Logger Pro software. If your school doesn't have that budget, the whole lab section becomes much harder to implement. I found that I could substitute with video analysis using free tools like Tracker, but it required rebuilding roughly forty percent of the lab activities myself. That is not a dealbreaker, but it is worth knowing upfront so you can plan accordingly. Building those substitutions usually took me about three to four hours per lab. Another counter-intuitive detail: the assessment section of the packet is almost entirely performance-based. There are very few traditional multiple-choice or calculation-only questions. If your school's administration requires standardized test prep alignment, you will need to supplement the Modeling assessments with external materials. The workshop creators deliberately designed the assessments to measure conceptual reasoning and modeling ability, which is pedagogically sound but functionally problematic for teachers under testing pressure. I spent roughly thirty percent of my implementation time creating parallel traditional assessments to satisfy my department requirements. The materials are available through the Arizona State University Modeling Website, which archived the full project. The direct download links tend to rotate or go dormant, so I would search for the ASU Modeling website's resource archive page and look for the 2006 workshop packets. The files are typically distributed as PDFs and occasional PowerPoint decks. Expect the total download to be around eighty to a hundred megabytes across all the modules.
If you are considering whether this approach fits your classroom, the honest answer depends on your schedule and your willingness to redesign. The modeling method does improve student retention of physics concepts — the research backing it is solid — but it requires roughly twice the preparation time in your first year compared to a traditional textbook-driven course. By the third year, once you have the full model library built and the lab sequences refined, the time investment drops to something manageable. Most teachers who abandon it do so in year one or two, not because the method fails, but because the initial ramp-up is steeper than they anticipated.
Get the Full Details
