Using Google Trends to Find What Podcasts People Actually Want
Google Trends is not the most glamorous tool on earth, but it works if you know how to use it properly. I have spent years digging through search data to figure out which podcasts are gaining traction before they hit the mainstream charts. The process is straightforward once you stop treating it like a magic spell and start treating it like actual data analysis. The core idea here is simple: you use Google Trends to identify rising search interest around podcast topics, then cross-reference those findings with actual podcast listings to build recommendations that people are already looking for. It sounds obvious when you write it down, but most people skip the cross-referencing step and end up recommending shows nobody is actively searching for. I ran into a specific problem last year where a client wanted me to find emerging podcast niches for a media company. I filtered Google Trends by the "Podcasts" category and looked at query terms with breakout status. The data pointed clearly toward a specific true crime subgenre involving cold cases from the 1980s. I recommended three smaller shows covering that angle. The client launched a podcast in that space six months later and it charted within the top twenty. The reason it worked was not luck. It was because the search data showed growing interest before the content supply caught up.
Here is how you actually do this without wasting three days on something that should take an afternoon. First, go to trends.google.com and set your geography to the market you care about. If you are targeting the United States, that is fine, but narrowing to specific states or metro areas often gives you better signals. Then type in broad podcast-related queries like "true crime podcast," "business podcast," or whatever genre you are investigating. Set the time range to the past 90 days rather than five years. Most people leave it on five years by default and end up with data that is too stale to act on. One thing beginners consistently get wrong is assuming that a rising trend means there is an opportunity. It often means the opposite. When a podcast topic hits peak search volume on Google Trends, the market is usually already saturated. I watched this happen with AI news podcasts in early 2024. Search interest spiked dramatically, but by the time the data turned green, every major network had already launched their version. The window for new entrants was closed. The workaround is to look for steady upward trajectories over sixty to ninety days rather than sharp spikes. A slow climb indicates organic growth in audience demand. A vertical spike usually indicates hype or a single viral moment that will fade in a few weeks. I keep a spreadsheet where I log the weekly trend lines for any genre I am tracking. It takes about ten minutes per week once you set it up, and it prevents you from chasing trends that are already dying.
After you identify the trending topics, you need to map them to actual podcasts. Go to Apple Podcasts or Spotify and search for those topics. Look for shows that have published consistently in the last three months but do not yet have millions of downloads. Those are your recommendations. Shows with massive download numbers are fine for listening, but they are not useful if you are trying to build a recommendation list for people who want something they have not already heard of. There is a limitation worth acknowledging here. Google Trends data is relative, not absolute. A breakout label means the search volume increased by at least 5000 percent compared to the previous period, but the actual search count could be as low as a few hundred queries. I learned this the hard way when I recommended a podcast about urban gardening based on breakout search data. The trend was real, but the total audience was tiny. The podcast I recommended had maybe two thousand monthly listeners across all platforms. It was a legitimate rising trend, but it was not a commercially viable opportunity. Always check whether the underlying search volume is large enough to matter for your purposes. Another useful trick is to compare multiple related queries at once. If you are researching cooking podcasts, enter "meal prep podcast," "quick dinner podcast," and "healthy cooking podcast" in the same comparison chart. Google Trends will show you which of those queries is gaining the most momentum relative to the others. This helps you narrow down to the specific subtopic that is currently resonating rather than guessing broadly.
Get the Full Details

Download the data if you need to dig deeper. Click the three dots in the corner of the trends graph and select "Download CSV." I do this whenever I am building a formal recommendation report because it lets me sort and filter the data in a way the interface does not allow. You can then merge that data with podcast directory listings to find shows that align with the rising topics. The whole process typically takes about forty-five minutes to an hour if you are doing a single genre deep dive. If you are watching multiple genres, plan for about two to three hours spread across a couple of days. You do not need any special tools beyond Google Trends, a podcast directory, and a spreadsheet. The bottleneck is usually how carefully you read the data rather than any technical limitation. If you want a quick starting point, here is a direct link to Google Trends: trends.google.com. Set the search type to "Podcasts" under the category dropdown, pick your region and time range, and enter your topic queries. Everything else follows from there.