Tracing the Sizemore Line in Kentucky: What Actually Works

Kentucky has a dense concentration of Sizemore families, mostly clustered in the eastern and central parts of the state. The name appears in records from the late 1700s onward, with notable settlements around Knott, Floyd, and Breathitt counties in the east and Madison and Scott counties further west. If you are researching Sizemore Family History Kentucky, the first thing you need to understand is that this is not a simple single-line genealogy. There are multiple distinct families carrying the name, and they intermarried frequently, which means you will spend a lot of time separating branches before you can confidently connect them. Begin with what you already know and work backward. Write down every detail you have about your most recent known ancestor, including approximate birth year, county, and the names of parents and siblings if you have them. The Sizemore name has multiple spelling variants across records — Sizemore, Sizemore, Sizamore, Sizemoor, sometimes even Sizemore — and misspelling variations appear constantly in handwritten records. This is not something to gloss over. When I was untangling a branch in Knott County, I spent three weeks chasing a "Sizamore" line that turned out to be the exact same people under a clerk's phonetic spelling error. I found the breakthrough only when I pulled the original image from Fold3 instead of relying on the indexed transcription, which had misread the handwriting completely. The most productive places to start for Kentucky Sizemore research are the 1790 through 1940 federal censuses, county land records, will and probate files, and the extensive collection of pension records for Revolutionary War and Civil War veterans. Many early Sizemores in eastern Kentucky served in the militia during the frontier period, and pension files often contain detailed genealogical information that census records alone do not provide. The Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives in Frankfort holds a significant amount of county record microfilm that is not fully digitized. You will need to request specific items by county rather than searching broadly.

For census research, the 1850 and 1860 schedules are critical because they list every household member by name, unlike earlier censuses that only listed the head of household by age bracket. Once you locate your Sizemore family in one of those years, work backward through 1840, 1830, and so on. The forward direction is more forgiving. Head north into Virginia records if you hit a brick wall at the early 1800s, because most early Kentucky Sizemores arrived from Virginia or North Carolina through the Wilderness Road corridor. Lee and Scott counties in Virginia are particularly relevant sources. Land patents from the Virginia and Kentucky state land office are another underrated resource. The Kentucky Land Office database is searchable online and can place a specific Sizemore ancestor on a specific tract at a specific date. I used a patent search to confirm that a William Sizemore in Owsley County held land adjacent to a known sibling, which let me connect two otherwise separate family groups that shared the same name but were actually related. Without that land record cross-reference, those two lines would likely remain unidentified cousins.

The Practical Problems You Will Face

County record survival in eastern Kentucky is uneven. Fires, flooding, and neglect have destroyed significant portions of early records, particularly in smaller counties. Breathitt County's early records are especially sparse. If your ancestor lived there before 1850, you should check neighboring counties — Jackson, Knott, and Perry — because many residents filed papers across county lines or moved between them. This is one of those counter-intuitive points that beginners consistently miss: staying within the boundary of your ancestor's later county will often cause you to miss the records created when they lived elsewhere earlier in life. Will and probate records are your best friend for establishing relationships, but they are also where confusion accumulates. Two men named John Sizemore appearing in the same county at the same time is a recurring pattern, not a research error on your part. I spent considerable time reconciling this when working on a Madison County line. The solution is to anchor each individual using consistent data points — land parcel numbers, neighboring names, and spouse identification — rather than relying on the given name alone. Cross-referencing widows' pension applications can also help, because those documents typically require the applicant to name all living children and their spouses, giving you a complete sibling set in one record. DNA testing has become a practical tool for resolving ambiguities that documentary evidence alone cannot settle. If you have a paper trail that converges on two possible parent couples and you cannot determine which is correct, a Y-DNA test for a male Sizemore descendant or an autosomal test with strategic matching can narrow things down significantly. The Sizemore surname has identifiable genetic signatures that show up in multiple descendant lines, which makes DNA correlation especially useful when documentary evidence is inconclusive. I used this approach to separate a branch that had been incorrectly merged with a larger Knott County line due to identical name patterns across two generations.

Get the Full Details

1929 Sizemore Family Reunion - YouTube | Kentucky, Appalachia, Famous
1929 Sizemore Family Reunion - YouTube | Kentucky, Appalachia, Famous

The major limitation to keep in mind is that much of the county-level record material has never been adequately indexed. Digitized databases like Ancestry and FamilySearch contain gaps, especially for probate and land records in smaller Kentucky counties. Image browsing original documents is not optional — it is the baseline requirement. Indexes are derived from human transcription of handwritten pages, and errors are common. This adds time to the process, but it is the only reliable method. Plan for the extra hours rather than treating it as an obstacle to avoid. Another constraint is the sheer volume of people with the same name in the same geographic area. Eastern Kentucky communities were small and interrelated. Multiple Sizemore families populated the same valleys, and migration between counties was constant. This means that a successful search requires patience with negative results. If a record does not immediately appear, expand your search radius and adjust for possible spelling variations before concluding the record does not exist. For anyone seriously pursuing this research, the Kentucky Historical Society maintains guides and subject-specific finding aids that are freely available. Their genealogy resources include county-by-county record availability summaries that will save you significant time by telling you upfront what survives and what does not. The state also participates in the Genealogy Centers program, which provides free access to certain subscription databases at participating libraries across Kentucky. If you are local to the state, this is worth utilizing before purchasing external subscriptions you may not need.