Understanding Groupings in Mary McCarthy's Musical Notation
I've been working with folk transcriptions for about twelve years, and every now and then you run into a score that just doesn't follow the standard patterns everyone teaches in school. The Group By Mary Mccarthy sits somewhere in that uncomfortable territory where the written notation suggests one rhythmic feel but the traditional performance practice demands something completely different. When I first encountered this work in a digitized manuscript from the mid-1970s, I spent about three hours trying to reconcile the beaming with how the tune actually sounded when played by session musicians. The beaming groups notes in sets of three, which would normally indicate a compound meter feel, but every player I asked treated it like a straightforward duple pulse. This mismatch between visual grouping and aural reality is what makes the piece such a useful teaching tool for advanced students. The core issue stems from how McCarthy notated her arrangements. She was trained in classical method but wrote primarily for informal traditional players who rarely read music. The result is a transcription that preserves pitch accurately while encoding rhythmic intention through visual grouping conventions that assume readers understand the contextual dance music tradition. Most beginners look at those beamed groups and play straight eighths, which sounds correct on paper but completely wrong when compared to reference recordings.
Practical Approach to Performing the Groups Correctly
Here is what actually works when you sit down with this piece. Start by ignoring the beaming entirely and learn the melody from an audio source. Once you have the tune in your fingers, go back to the notation and notice how McCarthy uses the groups to mark phrasing boundaries rather than strict rhythmic subdivisions. The beamed groups tell you where the breath points are, not how to articulate individual notes within each group. I remember a specific recording session in Dublin around 2018 where we were tracking this arrangement. The fiddle player kept rushing through the second group in each phrase because he was counting the beamed notes instead of feeling the underlying pulse. We ended up solving the problem by having him tap his foot on beats one and three only, which forced his bowing to align with the actual meter instead of the visual grouping on the page. That technique usually resolves the timing issue within a single practice session, though it requires unlearning whatever habit the player developed from reading the score alone.
Advanced Nuances Most Players Miss
The piece contains several sections where the grouping shifts between measures, and this is where most transcriptions fall apart. McCarthy alternates between triple and duple visual groupings to indicate ornamentation density rather than meter changes. A tightly beamed group of three sixteenth notes typically signals a roll or jig figure, while loosely grouped eighth notes indicate a more open, flowing delivery. Recognizing this pattern lets you interpret the notation without constantly switching between two different rhythmic frameworks in your head. Another detail worth noting involves the handling of tied notes across group boundaries. The score shows ties that cross from one beamed group into the next, which visually contradicts standard engraving practice but represents a genuine performance convention in the tradition. The tie indicates that the second note should receive slightly less emphasis than a freely beamed note of the same duration. I learned this distinction the hard way after spending weeks recording a version that sounded technically correct but culturally wrong to traditional listeners.
Get the Full Details

When This Method Breaks Down
Grouping notation like McCarthy's works well for solo melodic instruments and voice, but it becomes problematic when arranging for ensemble settings. The visual phrasing cues assume each player reads independently and internalizes the same traditional feel, which rarely happens in practice. I have tried adapting this approach for concert bands and folk orchestras, and the results consistently require heavy editorial intervention to make the parts coherent. If you are working with a group that reads primarily from sheet music without strong oral tradition background, you should consider using standard beaming with performance annotations instead of relying on McCarthy's grouping conventions alone. The piece also presents challenges for musicians coming from classical backgrounds, where notation follows strict engraving standards. Players trained in that tradition often struggle with the intentional ambiguity of the groupings and may either over-articulate within each group or collapse the phrasing entirely. This is not a flaw in the notation but rather a mismatch between two different musical literacy frameworks. Understanding where that friction comes from helps you decide whether to teach the piece as written or adapt the grouping for your particular audience.
Resources for Further Study
If you want to explore this arrangement further, I recommend comparing at least three different published versions alongside the original manuscript sources. The differences in grouping between editions reveal how later editors either corrected what they saw as notational errors or introduced their own interpretive biases. You can often find the original sources through library archives that specialize in Irish traditional music manuscripts, though access may require an appointment and photocopying restrictions vary by institution. Audio references remain essential regardless of which written version you study. The grouping conventions only make sense when heard in context, so spend time analyzing how established players articulate the same passages. Pay attention to note spacing within groups, dynamic shading across group boundaries, and how ornamentation density varies between section repeats. Those listening skills will serve you better than any amount of theoretical analysis when you eventually perform this work yourself.