Aleksandar Hemon's Debut Novel and What It Actually Feels Like to Read It
Reading The Lazarus Project isn't the same experience as most literary fiction. It doesn't build toward some grand emotional crescendo. It's more like watching two separate trains run parallel tracks and occasionally cross over each other in ways that feel almost accidental but are clearly deliberate. I spent about three days with it and kept putting it down not because I was bored but because the structure forces you to stay present in a way that's slightly uncomfortable. The basic setup sounds straightforward enough on paper: a fictionalized Aleksandar Hemon gets a chance to travel from Chicago to New York to research his novel-in-progress, which is about a real person who lived in Sarajevo during the 1990s. The actual book weaves between this metafictional frame and chapters that are supposedly excerpts from the manuscript about Lazar Longgfield, a Serbian immigrant who appears in an early twentieth-century photograph and whose story becomes the obsession of the narrator. The problem most readers hit, and I definitely did, is that the first twenty or thirty pages feel like they're building toward something and then just sort of sit there. You start wondering if you're supposed to feel some deep emotional connection to the protagonist and you realize you don't. That's kind of the point but it doesn't make the reading experience any less frustrating in the moment. One thing nobody really warns you about when picking this up is how much time the narrator spends thinking about food. I mean that literally. There are extended passages about what he wants to eat, what he remembers eating, and what different foods represent across cultures. At first I skimmed past these sections thinking they were filler. By page fifty I realized they were actually doing important thematic work about displacement and memory. The workaround I used was just accepting that Hemon is building a texture here rather than pushing plot forward. Once I stopped expecting traditional narrative momentum the book opened up significantly.
The structure itself deserves more credit than it usually gets. Hemon layers multiple timelines and voices without ever letting the reader settle into one comfortable perspective. You're reading about a character writing about another character who may or may not be based on a real person from a photograph. The Lazarus Project isn't really about resurrection in any religious sense despite the title. It's about how stories survive people and how the act of telling them changes both the teller and the subject. That's easier to see in hindsight than it is while you're actually reading it. I've recommended this book to people who like experimental structure and I've also seen it fall completely flat for readers who want a traditional coming-of-age story set during the Yugoslav wars. The truth is somewhere in between. If you're approaching it expecting The Reader or Even Cowgirls Get the Blues you'll be disappointed. But if you're willing to sit with the ambiguity and let the book work on you at its own pace it rewards that patience in ways that stick with you long after the final chapter. I still think about the ending about a year later which probably says more about the book's lingering quality than my own memory. There's also a practical note about the photography aspect that Hemon uses so effectively. The Lazarus figure appears in an actual historical photograph and the narrator's attempts to reconstruct that person's life mirror the reader's own attempts to reconstruct meaning from the text. It's a clever device but it does create a distance that some readers find alienating. I found it worked better when I accepted that the narrator himself is unreliable and possibly constructing more than he's discovering. That shift in expectations changed everything for me.
The prose itself is clean without being spare. Hemon writes like someone who understands that what you leave out matters as much as what you put in. There are moments of real beauty scattered throughout particularly in the descriptions of Sarajevo before the war and the narrator's observations about American culture. These sections don't always connect logically to the main narrative but they create a mood that's hard to shake. I'd classify this as essential reading for anyone interested in contemporary Eastern European literature but I wouldn't call it an easy read or even a particularly satisfying one in the traditional sense. What I learned from rereading portions of this was that the novel works better as a meditation on storytelling itself than as a vehicle for historical trauma. The war in Bosnia provides backdrop and motivation but the real subject is the narrator's relationship to language and identity. That's a subtler theme than the marketing materials suggest and it's worth keeping in mind before you dive in.
Get the Full Details
