A Practical Look At What This Documentary Actually Covers
The Making Of Asian America is a 2010 documentary directed by Peter D. Yung and Kit Chow that traces Asian American history from the 1800s through the present day. It covers everything from Chinese railroad workers and Japanese internment to the model minority myth and contemporary identity politics. The film is structured around archival footage, interviews, and historical documentation rather than a single narrative arc. The runtime is roughly 90 minutes. It airs on PBS as part of their Asian Americans series, which came out around the same period. You can find it streaming through various platforms depending on your region and what licensing deals are active at any given time. Sometimes it's on Kanopy through your local library. Other times it pops up on YouTube with full availability. Check both before assuming it's unavailable. The documentary is built around several key historical periods. The first act deals with early immigration and the exclusion era. Then it moves through World War II and internment. The middle section covers the Civil Rights era and how Asian American activists began organizing. The final portion addresses contemporary issues including model minority rhetoric and intersectional identity struggles.
Here is something most people miss when they're looking for this film: there are actually two related but different versions floating around. There is the standalone documentary itself, and then there is the companion book edited by Yuji Ichioka and Linda Trinh Võ called Asian American History Reconstructed. They share thematic DNA but they are not interchangeable. If you are citing this for academic work, make sure you are pulling from the correct source. I once had a student reference the documentary when they should have been using the book, and it threw off the entire paper's framework. The interviews in the film feature historians like Diane Fujino and activists like Yuri Kochiyama. The footage includes rare archival material from the 1960s and 70s that most people have not seen before. That alone makes it worth watching if you are researching this topic, even if the production quality is not exactly polished by modern documentary standards.
How To Actually Access It Without Wasting Time
The most reliable route is through academic or public library systems. Kanopy tends to have it in their collection. If your institution has a subscription, you log in and search the title directly. It is also sometimes available through Hoopla depending on what your library partners with. I found it on Kanopy at my local university library last year within about ten seconds of searching. YouTube sometimes has the full documentary uploaded legally, usually by PBS itself or affiliated channels. If the link is there, grab it. The quality varies. YouTube's compression can make some of the older archival footage look worse than it already is, which is annoying if you are trying to read text from historical documents shown on screen. If neither of those options works, the DVD is still in circulation through Amazon and other retailers. The DVD version is clean and complete. Nothing is cut. Streaming versions sometimes get edited for time or content depending on the platform's licensing terms.
One edge case worth noting: some streams of this film are labeled under slightly different titles depending on the distributor. If you are searching and not finding it, try variations like "Asian Americans The Documentary" since it was part of a larger PBS series. That is how I eventually tracked down a working link after searching for the exact title kept returning nothing for about twenty minutes.
What The Film Does Well And Where It Falls Short
The documentary does an effective job covering the breadth of Asian American history across multiple ethnic groups. Most films in this space focus heavily on either Japanese American or Chinese American experiences. This one attempts to include Korean, Indian, Filipino, Vietnamese, and other communities within a single frame. That ambition is its strength and its weakness. The coverage is necessarily shallow for each individual group because of the runtime constraint. You get maybe five to seven minutes per major community's historical arc. If you are looking for deep analysis of any single group's experience, you will leave this film wanting more. It is a survey course, not a seminar. Another limitation is that the film predates several significant developments in Asian American discourse. Issues like South Asian American experiences post-9/11, the rise of multiracial Asian American identity, and more recent debates about representation in media are not addressed. The film was released before the 2012 election and the subsequent surge in discussions about Asian American political power. That context is missing.
The pacing can feel uneven. Some segments drag while others rush through decades of history in under three minutes. The interview subjects are credible but the editing sometimes juxtaposes quotes in ways that feel forced rather than organic. It is not a badly made film, but it is clearly a television documentary made on a television budget and timeline. For anyone actually studying this material, I would pair this documentary with the book by Ichioka and Võ and also with Gary Okihiro's Columbia Heights: A History of the Pacific Coast Asian American Community. Those two sources fill in the gaps that the film necessarily leaves open. The documentary works best as an overview or entry point, not as a primary research source on its own. There is also a sequel documentary called Asian Americans that came out in 2017 on PBS, hosted by Kevin Quan. That one covers more recent history and has better production values. If you end up watching this 2010 film and feeling like it left you wanting more chronological coverage, the 2017 follow-up picks up where this one kind of stops. They complement each other reasonably well if you watch both.
The film is free to stream if you have the right library card or institutional login. That makes it accessible in a way that a lot of documentary content from this period is not. I recommend watching it at 1.25x speed if you want to trim the runtime down to about seventy minutes without losing substance. The slower sections tend to be the interview segments that repeat points already made.
Get the Full Details
