Picking Through Modern Historiography Reader Collections
The The Modern Historiography Reader Western Sources Routledge Readers In History is a standard anthology used in graduate seminars on historical theory and methodology. It collects translated passages from Western historians spanning roughly the 18th century through the late 20th century, organized thematically rather than chronologically. You will find excerpts from Ranke, Burckhardt, Bloch, Febvre, Weber, Weber, and later figures like Hobsbawm and Thompson alongside older primary historiographical texts. The book functions as a course reader more than a treatise, which means it has structural compromises you need to understand before you rely on it. I have used this volume across three different syllabi now, and the first thing you should notice is how the editor makes cuts. A lot of the selections are heavily excerpted. When you are reading a chapter from Method in History by R.G. Collingwood, you might only get a fraction of the argument. I ran into this problem directly when I was cross-referencing Bloch's Apologie pour l'histoire for a paper. The Routledge edition gives you the published version, not the manuscript reconstruction that scholars now prefer. The translation choices in the anthology version flatten some of the argumentative edges. My workaround was straightforward: I bought a separate copy of the Cambridge University Press edition of Bloch's work, which includes the postwar editorial reconstruction, and kept both open side by side during research. It adds about twenty minutes to your reading session per source, but it saves you from citing a version that major Bloch scholars would flag as incomplete. The organization is by theme, which sounds logical but creates a specific distortion. You read Weber alongside Braudel alongside a contemporary critic, and the thematic grouping implies a dialogue between them that is mostly fabricated by the editor's scaffolding. The chronological distance between a 19th-century nationalist historian and a 1970s Marxist is collapsed into a single chapter. This is useful for comparative essays but misleading if you want to understand how these ideas actually developed in conversation. I have seen students write papers treating these as a continuous debate when they were separated by generations and had never actually responded to one another.
How to get the most out of this reader is mostly about treating it as a starting point, not an endpoint. The introductions to each section are competent but brief, usually two or three pages. They give you the thematic framing but not the intellectual genealogy. If you are using this for a thesis or a serious research project, you need to follow the citations. Every selection comes with a bibliography at the back of the book, and those references are where the real work lives. I typically spend less time on the primary excerpts themselves than on tracking down the secondary literature that the editor references. The reader gives you the map, but the territory is elsewhere. One common pitfall is assuming the translations are definitive. Routledge commissioned new translations for several of the major texts, and while they are generally reliable, they are not the only option. The Bloch situation I mentioned is the most significant example. There is also a known issue with the selection from Marc Bloch's La Société Féodale where the editor splices together passages from two different sections without making that clear. You can spot it if you know what you are looking for, but a first-time reader will miss it entirely. I mark these issues in the margins of my copies, which slows me down during initial reading but pays off during writing. The paperback edition runs around 400 pages and is priced at approximately $45 to $55 depending on the retailer. The hardcover is substantially more expensive and not worth it for a reader volume. Several of the selections overlap with material available in other Routledge Readers volumes, particularly the Historiography Reader and the Medieval History Reader. If you already own one of those, check the table of contents before buying this one. I ended up returning a copy after realizing that half the Weber and Sombart selections were duplicated from a volume I already had.
There are genuine limitations to this kind of anthology. The Western focus is stated in the subtitle but still shapes the intellectual framework of every chapter. Non-Western historiographical traditions are entirely absent, which matters more than the editor probably intends. The period coverage skews heavily toward modern European intellectual history. If your interests extend into global history, postcolonial historiography, or non-European traditions, this reader will leave significant gaps. I use it as a companion to W.H. Dray's Philosophy of History and Peter Burke's What is Cultural History? to round out the picture. Those two books address the blind spots directly. The digital versions are available through academic library platforms but the pagination differs between print and eBook formats, which causes citation problems. I always verify page numbers against the print edition before finalizing any references. This takes extra time but prevents embarrassing errors in submitted work. The publisher's website sometimes lists errata for the print run, though it is inconsistent about which editions are covered. I check there for each new printing I encounter. If you are a graduate student looking for a single volume to anchor your historiography seminar, this is adequate. If you are doing original research that engages deeply with any of the individual thinkers represented here, you will outgrow the excerpts quickly and need the full works. That is true of almost any reader in this format, but it is worth stating explicitly before you invest time in building a bibliography around anthology selections alone.
Get the Full Details
