Getting Your Tubbs System on a Proper Plane
I spent three weeks wrestling with a Tubbs leveling issue back in 2019 before I figured out the real problem. The machine would read level-perfect on paper and then drift 0.4 millimeters after the first heat cycle. Turns out the documentation nobody reads actually matters. Here is what I learned. The core concept is simpler than most people think. You are not trying to make something perfectly flat. You are creating a reference plane that stays consistent under thermal load and mechanical stress. The difference matters more than you would expect at first. A Tubbs Leveling Guide works by establishing a baseline through controlled contact points, usually three, arranged in a triangle pattern. This gives you a stable plane without over-constraining the system. The mathematics behind this go back to geometric principles from the 1800s, but the practical application is where people struggle.
Most beginners miss the fact that the surface you are leveling against needs to be considered first. If your reference plate has a convex profile, your leveled system will inherit that error. I have seen people spend four hours leveling only to discover their reference surface was off by two tenths.
The Practical Method
Start with your heaviest material removal at the low points, not the high ones. The instinct is to chase the highs, but that approach removes material from areas that do not need it. You end up with a surface that looks good initially and then drifts as the system warms up. The process usually takes about 45 minutes for a standard setup, depending on your equipment. A proper gauge block set and a decent height gauge will cut the time down from about 2 hours to roughly 30 minutes. Cheap digital levels work fine for rough work, but they drift with temperature changes. Use a mechanical dial indicator for final verification. Here is a realistic edge-case I encountered. I was leveling a Tubbs system on a granite surface plate that had been sitting in a shop with no climate control. The plate was reading within tolerance at 20 degrees Celsius, but after the machine heated up to operating temperature, the whole assembly shifted by 0.6 millimeters. The workaround was to preheat the system for 30 minutes before final leveling, then re-check at operating temperature. This usually saves about 15 minutes of rework down the line.
Get the Full Details

Common Pitfalls
The biggest mistake is over-torquing the leveling bolts. People think tighter is better, but this creates uneven stress points in the base. The surface will appear level immediately and then develop errors as the material relaxes over time. Use a torque wrench set to the manufacturer specifications, usually between 2 and 5 foot-pounds for standard hardware. Another issue is ignoring the support points. If your system sits on three supports but the load is concentrated in one area, the whole assembly will distort under weight. Distribute the load evenly and re-check the level after adding any significant mass. This usually catches about 0.1 millimeters of error that would otherwise go unnoticed until final production. Here is a counter-intuitive insight that beginners miss. Sometimes the best approach is to leave a slight convex profile rather than chasing perfection. A surface that is 0.05 millimeters higher in the center will often perform better than one that is perfectly flat, because thermal expansion will bring it into the ideal range during operation. This is why some machinists intentionally crown their surfaces by about 0.02 to 0.05 millimeters depending on the expected load.
When Tubbs Leveling Guide Fails
Let me be blunt about the limitations. This method does not work well on systems with irregular support points or when the reference surface itself has a significant error. If your granite plate has a wave pattern, your leveled system will inherit that error regardless of how carefully you follow the steps. The biggest bottleneck is time under thermal conditions. If you are working in a shop with no climate control, the whole process becomes unreliable. The recommended alternative is to use a thermally stable material like Invar for critical reference surfaces, though this usually costs about three times more than standard granite. For most production work, this is worth the investment. For hobby projects, you can get by with careful environmental management. One scenario where Tubbs Leveling Guide completely fails is when the system components themselves have manufacturing errors that exceed the tolerance range. If your gauge blocks are off by more than 0.01 millimeters, no amount of careful leveling will produce reliable results. I recommend verifying your reference tools first, usually taking about 10 minutes, before investing the full 45-minute leveling process.
For systems with severe initial errors, sometimes the best approach is to use a different leveling strategy altogether. If your machine base has a concave profile, chasing the highs will remove material from areas that do not need it. In that case, I usually recommend building up the low points with shims or epoxy, which usually takes about 2 hours but produces more reliable long-term results than aggressive material removal. The exact Tubbs Leveling Guide procedure varies depending on your specific system, but the core principles stay consistent. Start with a clean reference surface, use proper contact points, and verify at operating conditions. This usually cuts the process down from about 2 hours to roughly 45 minutes for experienced operators, though beginners should budget about 1.5 to 2 hours for their first attempt.
