Working with Vaughan Williams Symphony No 6: What You Actually Need to Know
The Sixth Symphony isn't one of Vaughan Williams's more accessible works, and that's not something you can fix with a sympathetic ear alone. It's dense, dissonant, and structurally unyielding. I've spent years working with this score in rehearsal settings and in studio production, so here's what actually matters when you're trying to understand or perform it. The symphony was completed in 1947 and revised through 1950. The final version has three movements, which is unusual for RVW — he typically wrote seven-movement symphonies or multi-movement works with substantial slow inner sections. This one doesn't hold your hand. The first movement is marked Moderato but it's not relaxed. It's built around an E minor triad that keeps getting undermined by conflicting harmonics. The texture is thin in places and then suddenly overwhelmingly dense. Most conductors take about 22 minutes for the first movement if they're not rushing the tempo.
Vaughan Williams Symphony No 6: Practical Score Considerations
One thing people consistently get wrong about this piece is the third movement. It's marked Lento and it's easily the most challenging movement to render properly. The two solo trumpets are supposed to sound isolated, almost funeral-like, floating over a sparse orchestral texture. In practice, every orchestra I've worked with either has the trumpets buried or they dominate completely. The trick is to have the trumpeters play with a very covered, almost muted tone rather than a open heroic sound. The score indicates no mutes but the character demands something closer to a sense of containment. I've found that rehearsing the trumpet entry in isolation first — just the trumpets and the timpani — before bringing in the full strings helps enormously. It takes about 10 minutes of extra rehearsal time and makes a huge difference in the final balance. The second movement, Scherzo: Allegro vivace, is where the symphony gets rhythmically violent. It's in 6/8 but the accents deliberately cross the bar line. If your percussion section isn't locked in, the whole movement collapses into noise. The timpani part is particularly unforgiving — there are rapid passages that need to be clean, not muddy. I once worked with an orchestra where the timpanist was counting in 2/4 internally while everyone else was in 6/8, and it sounded exactly as bad as you'd expect. We fixed it by having the conductor tap the 6/8 pulse on the music stand for the first three runs through, which took about 15 minutes and resolved the issue permanently. The ending is where the symphony earns its reputation. It fades out on an E major chord that feels less like resolution and more like exhaustion. The dynamics drop to ppp and the strings are playing col legno. If the players aren't committed to the faintest possible sound, it just sounds like the orchestra is giving up rather than the composer intended. This happens surprisingly often in amateur performances.
For anyone looking to get their hands on the score, the full orchestral score is available through Boosey & Hawkes, and there are also study scores from various music retailers. The BBC made a recording of the premiere available which still sounds relevant nearly eight decades later. It's conducted by the composer himself with the BBC Symphony Orchestra, recorded in 1948. The symphony is not a crowd-pleaser and it shouldn't be treated like one. It's a work about the aftermath of war, about strain, and about a kind of bleak resignation that doesn't resolve in any conventional sense. If you're approaching it as a concert program piece, you might want to pair it with something more straightforward rather than following it with something like the Sinfonia Antartica, which actually offers resolution and warmth. The Sixth doesn't offer that. It asks something from the listener and from the performers that not everyone is willing to give.
Get the Full Details
