So you need the DVD resolution number for something.

It's 720 by 480 pixels in NTSC regions, or 720 by 576 in PAL. The width stays at 720 either way. The height changes. I've had this come up more times than I care to count, usually from someone who just watched an old DVD on a 4K TV and is trying to figure out why everything looked soft. Or they're working on a project that requires a specific pixel dimension and they need the exact number before they commit. That's the core question. 720x480 for NTSC. 720x576 for PAL. That's it. But here's where people get tripped up, and I ran into this recently when a client asked me to upscale a batch of DVD rips for a digital restoration job. They assumed the files were 720x480 because they'd just pulled them from a disc. The rips looked fine on paper. Then they threw them into their editing software and the frame aspect ratio was wrong. Everything looked slightly squished horizontally. I spent about twenty minutes digging through the metadata before I realized the issue: the pixel aspect ratio. The frames were labeled with a PAR of 8:9 (NTSC) or 16:15 (PAL), which means the pixels aren't square. When software reads them as square pixels, the image distorts. The fix was straightforward — set the proper pixel aspect ratio in the project settings before any upscaling or processing. Without that, you're working with corrupted geometry from the start. The actual displayed resolution is 640 by 480 for NTSC when you account for the non-square pixels. Same thing for PAL: 704 by 576. The 720 number includes a small amount of overscan padding that your TV would have cropped anyway on an actual playback. If you're ripping DVDs and intend to use the footage in a modern project, you probably want to work with the full 720-pixel width but be aware that the outer edges are essentially dead space. I usually crop about 4 pixels from each side on NTSC rips and 8 pixels on PAL before doing anything else.

Another thing nobody warns you about: interlacing. DVDs are almost always interlaced content. If you're importing them directly into an editor and the software doesn't handle deinterlacing automatically, you're going to get combing artifacts on any movement. I've seen beginners miss this for hours, thinking their source files were corrupt or low quality, when the problem was just an unchecked deinterlace setting. Set your project to deinterlace on import and you'll save yourself a lot of headaches. It adds a processing step, maybe thirty seconds per clip on a typical system, but it makes the footage usable. If you need to extract the video from a DVD yourself, you can rip it with tools like MakeMKV or HandBrake. HandBrake is free and gives you control over the output format and resolution. MakeMKV does a bit-for-bit rip which preserves the original DVD structure. Both are reliable. There are plenty of download sites for these — just grab the official versions and skip the third-party wrappers that tend to bundle unwanted software. The real takeaway here is that the number alone doesn't tell the whole story. You need the pixel aspect ratio, the field order, the interlacing state, and whether you're using the full 720 width or the active picture area. Ignore any of those and your output will look off even if the pixel count matches exactly.

I keep a quick reference sheet on my desk with these numbers because I get asked about it constantly. It's one of those things that sounds simple until you hit the edge cases, and the edge cases are where the actual problems live. DVDs are old technology but they're still everywhere, and the resolution question comes up in a surprising number of workflows.

Get the Full Details

What is DVD Resolution and How to Get the Highest
What is DVD Resolution and How to Get the Highest