Finding a decent geometry manual isn't as simple as it sounds
Most people grab whatever textbook comes up on Amazon and immediately run into problems. The quality varies wildly between editions and publishers. I've spent years sifting through these things for students and colleagues, and there are actual reliable sources if you know where to look.Where To Find Geometry Manual
The actual resources
OpenStax is the first place I check. Their geometry course is free, peer-reviewed, and available as a downloadable PDF. It's not the prettiest book you'll ever own, but the content is solid and it covers everything from basic proofs to coordinate geometry. You can grab it here. Then there's the CK-12 library. Their geometry flexbook is modular, which means you can jump straight to the topics you need instead of reading chapter by chapter. I prefer this when someone just needs help on triangle congruence or circle theorems and doesn't want to wade through forty pages of review material. For something more traditional, the classic Euclid elements public domain copies are still circulating. The Heath translation is the standard one. It's dense and occasionally frustrating, but if you're doing proof-based work, going to the source has value that modern textbooks sometimes smooth over.
What most people miss about these manuals
The biggest issue isn't finding a geometry manual. It's that most free versions skip the solution sets or put them behind a separate paywall. I ran into this with a student who was using a free PDF that had zero worked examples for the later chapters on volume and surface area. We ended up cross-referencing with the teacher's edition from their local community college library. Another thing nobody warns you about: edition years matter more than you'd think. A geometry manual from 2018 will have different notation conventions than one from 2022. The theorems are the same, but the way they present proof structure can shift enough to confuse someone learning the material. If your class uses a specific textbook, try to match the edition. The mismatch between editions causes more confusion than it should.
When free doesn't cut it
There are cases where a free manual simply won't work. If you need rigorous problem sets with detailed solutions, or if you're preparing for an exam like the SAT Subject Test in Math 2, you'll want something with more practice problems than OpenStax provides. In those situations, buying a used copy of Larson or Jurgensen from eBay or AbeBooks usually runs fifteen to twenty dollars and includes answer keys at the back of the book. The tradeoff is that used books sometimes have handwritten notes in the margins from previous students. Most of it is useless, but occasionally someone has actually written useful problem-solving strategies in pencil. I've found three-page notes on constructing auxiliary lines in triangles that were worth more than the book itself.
Get the Full Details

A note on format
PDFs are fine for reference, but if you're working through problems regularly, a physical copy or an e-ink reader works better. Screens make it harder to sketch diagrams alongside the text, and geometry problems basically require you to draw on them. This is one of those areas where the medium genuinely affects the learning process, not just convenience. I usually recommend starting with OpenStax to confirm the material is understandable, then supplementing with a purchased textbook if you need the practice problems and solutions. It's not the most efficient path, but it's the one that actually prevents people from spending money on a book they can't follow.