What the Art Instruction Schools Test Actually Is
The Art Instruction Schools Test was the standardized assessment used by Art Instruction Schools, Inc. (founded 1933, Minneapolis) to evaluate student progress in their correspondence art programs. It wasn't a single exam you took once — it was a series of graded assignments and periodic evaluation tests that measured drawing fundamentals: proportion, value, perspective, anatomy, and composition. The test structure was designed for self-paced distance learning, meaning students submitted work through the mail and received critiques back, usually within a couple weeks. Most people looking this up now are either collectors of vintage art education materials or researchers studying correspondence-based art pedagogy. A smaller group is trying to replicate the curriculum for modern self-study.
Art Instruction Schools Test: A Practical Breakdown
Here is how the test actually functioned in practice. You enrolled in a course — say, Figure Drawing or Perspective and Rendering — and over the semester you completed a set number of lessons. Each lesson contained specific instructions, reference images, and a task. At the end of certain units, you would complete a graded test assignment. You'd draw it, photograph or mail the original, and send it in. An instructor would grade it against a rubric and return written feedback. The rubrics were surprisingly detailed for their era. Grades weren't just letter-based; they included specific notation about where you went wrong — "shadow edge too hard," "foreshortening on left arm inconsistent," that kind of thing. That level of feedback is what made the program credible for decades. I spent about three years tracking down complete sets of these tests for a restoration project on a mid-century illustration curriculum. The hardest part wasn't finding the syllabi — those are relatively available through the Minnesota Historical Society archives — it was finding the actual grading rubrics and sample student work. Those are scattered across estate sales, online auction listings, and private collections. What I found helped me understand something most people miss about how these tests worked.
The test assignments were not meant to be passed on the first submission. The system was designed around iteration. You would get your graded work back with notes, correct your mistakes, and resubmit or move forward with that feedback applied. The pedagogical model was deliberate correction, not one-and-done evaluation. If you treated it like a high-stakes exam, you were using it wrong.
Get the Full Details
How to Access and Use These Tests Today
There is no official centralized download for Art Instruction Schools Test materials. The school itself rebranded and eventually merged into other educational ventures, so the original test bank is not publicly hosted anywhere. Here are the realistic paths people use: First, the Minnesota Historical Society holds a significant collection of Art Instruction Schools records. Their finding aids are online and searchable. You can request digitization of specific test folders. Turnaround is usually two to four weeks depending on volume. This is the most reliable source for authentic materials.
Second, AbeBooks and eBay regularly list individual test booklets, usually as standalone lot items. Expect to pay between fifteen and eighty dollars per booklet depending on condition and rarity. Some sellers bundle entire course sequences. I once found a complete 1958 Perspective and Rendering course with all twelve test assignments for forty-two dollars, but the shipping was twenty-eight dollars and the condition was rough — several pages were foxed from moisture damage. Third, there are scanned PDFs floating around on art history forums and archival sites like archive.org. These tend to be lower quality scans taken from personal copies, but they are free and decent for study purposes. Search terms like "Art Instruction Schools Minneapolis test assignment" will pull up relevant results. I should note a specific problem I ran into that nobody warns you about. Some of the test assignments include copyrighted reference photographs or artist studies that the school originally produced in-house. When people try to redistribute these scans online, they sometimes trigger copyright takedowns because the underlying imagery still belongs to estates or publishers. The tests themselves are fine to study privately, but posting full scans publicly is a legal gray area. I learned this the hard way when one of my project folders got flagged.
Common Misunderstandings About the Curriculum
People assume these tests were generic drawing exercises. They were not. The Art Instruction Schools had a proprietary methodology that differed noticeably from both the French Academic tradition and the American Illustration School approach that dominated later art education. Their system emphasized structural construction before rendering. Students learned to block in forms geometrically before adding value or detail. This is counter to what most modern beginner art tutorials teach, which often lead with observational shading right away. The school's approach produced illustrators who could draw from imagination with reasonable accuracy, which was the whole point — these were commercial art programs, not fine art studios. Another misconception is that the difficulty was uniform across all courses. It wasn't. The Figure Drawing course had the highest failure rate and the longest average completion time. The Basic Design course was considered introductory and had the fastest pass rate. I compiled completion data from several student records I came across, and the numbers roughly held: Figure Drawing averaged fourteen to eighteen months for full completion, while shorter courses like Color Theory wrapped up in three to five months.
Here is a practical tip that matters more than anything else I am about to say: if you are working through these tests yourself, do not skip the preliminary construction drawings. The instructors specifically flagged students who jumped into final rendering without completing the under-drawing phase. Their notes were blunt about it — "construction incomplete, proportion unreliable" appeared frequently in rejection feedback. Spending an extra hour on the block-in stage cut my redo rate from roughly one in three assignments down to maybe one in ten.
Limitations You Should Know About
These tests have real limitations if you are trying to use them for contemporary art education. The reference material is dated. The figure drawing tests rely on pose references from the 1940s and 1950s, which means the clothing, poses, and cultural context are period-specific. That is fine if you are studying illustration history, but less useful if you need modern anatomical reference or contemporary figure drawing practice. The correspondence format also means you do not get real-time feedback. In 2026, there are far better alternatives for live critique — online ateliers, Discord study groups, structured platforms like New Masters Academy. The Art Instruction Schools Test materials are best treated as historical documents and supplementary study guides, not as a complete replacement for current pedagogical tools. If your goal is purely to learn drawing fundamentals on a budget, you can replicate roughly eighty percent of what these tests cover using free resources. Proko's figure drawing videos, Drawabox for perspective and construction, and the Book of a Thousand Days for value studies will get you most of the way there without mailing anything anywhere. The Art Instruction Schools material adds historical context and a structured progression that those free resources don't always provide, but the core technical content overlaps significantly.
For researchers and collectors, the value is in the grading methodology and the specific pedagogical sequence. Those pieces are not easily replicated from modern sources. For practicing artists, the value is conditional — useful as a supplementary curriculum, less useful as a primary one.
