Two tools that do fundamentally different things, but keep getting compared because they both move planets around

I've used both Astroclick Travel and Local Space for over a decade, usually in the same session. They're not interchangeable. People conflate them because both involve moving things on a chart, but the underlying mechanics and intended uses are totally separate. Here's how they actually work in practice and when you should reach for each one. Astroclick Travel is a transit and progression visualization tool. You cast a natal chart, then drag a time slider along the ecliptic. The planets move in real time so you can watch when Mercury stations retrograde, when a Saturn square hits, or when a progressed midpoint becomes exact. The interface is intuitive once you stop expecting it to do what a normal chart calculator does. It doesn't generate reports. It shows motion. Local Space, built on David Coon's methodology, adjusts all planetary longitudes based on your geographic coordinates. Longitude gets converted to time (one degree equals four minutes), then added to or subtracted from each planet's position depending on whether you're east or west of the calculation point. The result is a local space chart where planetary positions reflect where those energies are locally active. It's primarily used for relocation analysis and timing events tied to specific places.

The practical difference: Astroclick Travel answers when something happens. Local Space answers where it's most potent or when it hits locally. Using both together is where it gets useful, and also where people get confused. I ran into a specific issue last year that exposed the gap between the two. A client had a major career shift coming up and wanted to know both the timing and the best location for it. I pulled an Astroclick Travel forecast showing a Jupiter trine to natal MC around March 2024. Solid window. Then I generated Local Space charts for three cities — Lisbon, Mexico City, and Toronto — to see which location brought that transit into sharper local focus. The Local Space chart for Mexico City showed the transferred Jupiter hitting 11° Sagittarius, while her relocated Sun sat at nearly the same degree. That alignment didn't show up in Lisbon or Toronto. We went with Mexico City and the timing held. Without the Local Space layer, I would have only had the transit window and no guidance on where to be during it. Here's a counter-intuitive thing most beginners miss about Local Space: it is not the same as a relocation chart. A relocation chart shifts the house system based on geographic coordinates while keeping the original planetary positions. Local Space shifts the actual planetary longitudes. The houses in a Local Space chart are usually still calculated for the original birth location. If you treat Local Space like a relocation chart, you'll misread house meanings entirely. Check your chart calculator settings. Some programs label their output as "Local Space" but actually produce a solar arc or secondary direction variant.

Another nuance with Astroclick Travel: the time slider moves through both natural transits and profection years if you enable that layer. By default it shows transits only. If you're tracking a yearly cycle and don't notice the profection overlay, you'll attribute an event to the wrong planetary driver. I learned that the hard way during a Neptune opposition reading where the profection indicator was on without me realizing it. Both tools have real limitations. Astroclick Travel's free version caps how far into the future you can scroll, usually around ten to fifteen years depending on the version. The paid upgrade removes that, but even then, the interface is clunky for backtracking — scrolling past the current date feels sluggish on older devices. Local Space requires precise birth time. If your birth time is off by more than four minutes, the longitude adjustment throws every planet out of sign, and the whole chart becomes unreliable. There's no tolerance buffer built in. Also, Local Space doesn't account for latitude, only longitude. For high-latitude locations above 55 degrees north or south, the calculations drift further from practical relevance. If you need a download path, Astroclick Travel is available through the AstroClick network — look for the Travel variant on the main AstroClick website. Local Space charts can be generated through Solar Fire, which has a built-in Local Space function under the chart type menu, or through the Astrodienst report system which offers it as a paid report. Free alternatives like JPL's horoscope tools don't include Local Space calculations.

Get the Full Details

AstroClick Travel lines vs. Local Space lines…? : r/astrocartography
AstroClick Travel lines vs. Local Space lines…? : r/astrocartography

For a streamlined workflow, I generate the transit timeline in Astroclick Travel first to identify active windows, then pull Local Space charts for the top two or three candidate cities during those windows. It usually takes me about twelve minutes total once I have my template charts loaded. Doing it blindly without that sequence wastes more time than it saves.