What You're Actually Looking At
Catholic Music Through The Ages by Edward Schaefer is a substantial reference work — somewhere around 300+ pages — that traces the development of liturgical music in the Catholic tradition from the earliest Christian communities all the way through the post-Vatican II period. It's not a hymnal. It's not a practical play-it-by-eye guide. It's a scholarly survey that pulls together historical context, musical analysis, and liturgical theology in one volume. Schaefer wrote it because he saw a real gap: most priests and music directors could name a composer or two, but they didn't understand why certain musical forms belonged in liturgy and others didn't. The book attempts to fill that gap. This is the full title you'll see on library catalogs and academic citations. Sometimes people refer to it just as "Schaefer" when they're talking about it in music ministry circles. It was published by Catholic University of America Press, which tells you something about the intended audience — this isn't a coffee-table book. It's written for people who are already engaged with the material and want depth. I picked this up about ten years ago when our parish was going through a fairly painful transition with liturgical music. We had a organist who liked to play romantic-era transcriptions of pop songs during communion, and the pastor wanted something more "authentic" but nobody actually knew what that meant. Someone in the diocesan office recommended Schaefer. It turned out to be more useful than I expected, mainly because it gave me a vocabulary to explain why certain choices made sense and others didn't, without sounding like I was just being pretentious about it. Which is harder than it sounds in a parish setting.
The book is divided into roughly chronological sections. You've got early music and the development of chant, the medieval period and the rise of polyphony, the Renaissance and the Roman School, the Baroque era with its very different relationship to the liturgy, the Classical period, and then the 19th and 20th centuries which get a fair amount of attention because that's where the modern problems originate. Each section covers the major composers and forms, but more importantly it explains the liturgical circumstances that produced them. That contextual piece is where the book earns its keep. One thing beginners often miss: Schaefer doesn't treat this as purely a music history textbook. He's making an argument about what makes liturgical music liturgical — meaning it serves the rite rather than using the rite as a concert platform. That's a distinction that matters enormously if you're actually selecting music for Sunday Mass, and it's the thread that runs through the entire book. The early chapters on chant and polyphony aren't just nostalgic. They're establishing a baseline for what liturgical music is supposed to do. The trouble is that the later chapters, especially the ones on the 20th century, can feel a bit dated depending on which printing you have. The original editions came out before some of the more recent liturgical documents were finalized, and the discussion of contemporary music skews heavily toward the mid-to-late 1900s. If you're working with a parish that's actively experimenting with current composers, you'll want to supplement this with something more current. But for understanding the foundation — the centuries of practice that the Second Vatican Council's Musaicae Sacrae Disciplina and Sacrosanctum Concilium were built upon — there's still nothing as compact and thorough.
I ran into a specific problem a few years back that the book helped me work through. We were trying to figure out whether to use a certain polyphonic setting for the Gloria at a solemn High Mass. The choir had learned it, it sounded good, but I wasn't sure it met the actual liturgical criteria. Schaefer's chapter on the Roman School and the Palestrina tradition gave me the framework to evaluate it properly — not just whether it was "beautiful" but whether it respected the hierarchical structure of the liturgy, whether the text was clear and appropriately set, and whether it fit the rank of the day. The workaround was actually pretty simple: I stopped asking whether it was a "good piece of music" and started asking whether it was a good piece of liturgical music. That shifted the whole conversation in our music committee meetings. If you're looking to get a copy, the standard print edition is available through Catholic University of America Press directly, Amazon, and most well-stocked religious bookstores. Some diocesan libraries carry it, and it occasionally shows up on AbeBooks in used condition since older editions circulate pretty regularly. There isn't an official free digital version — anything you find offering a PDF download is probably pirated, and the quality on those scans tends to be poor enough that the musical examples become nearly useless. That's a real practical issue with this book because the musical notation is genuinely part of the argument. Reading about chant without being able to see the neumes and the text underlay is like reading a cookbook without the recipe. Acoustically, if you're considering this for a parish library or a small music ministry collection, it's worth noting that Schaefer assumes a certain level of musical literacy. You don't need to be a conductor, but you should be comfortable reading basic notation and understanding terms like antiphon, responsorial psalm, and Kyrie eleison in their liturgical sense. If your volunteer music team is mostly made up of people who learned music by ear in contemporary worship bands, this book will feeldense. Not impossible, but dense. In that case, pairing it with something more accessible like Brian Wren's work on worship music or even the USCCB's own guidelines on music in the liturgy would give you a better entry point before coming back to Schaefer for the deeper material.
Get the Full Details
