Working Within the Lines: What Maryland Actually Lets You Do
The Maryland Board of Cosmetology regulates what estheticians can and cannot do, and the boundary is tighter than most people assume when they get their license. The general scope covers superficial treatments to the epidermis and upper dermis: facials, chemical peels up to a certain depth, microdermabrasion, waxing, lash and brow services, and makeup application. That's the clean version. The messy version involves figuring out where "superficial" actually ends and where you're trespassing into medical territory without a physician's signature. Estheticians in Maryland operate under Title 13 of the Health Occupation Code and the corresponding board regulations. You're allowed to perform non-invasive procedures that don't break the skin beyond the stratum corneum or upper dermis. Light chemical peels using AHAs and BHAs are fair game. Deeper peels like phenol-based treatments cross the line and belong to medical professionals. There's a specific list of approved peel concentrations and skin levels in the code, but honestly, most boards just use the general "shall not penetrate beyond the papillary dermis" standard and leave it to you to know where that falls on the chemical ladder. Needle-based procedures are a different category entirely. Microneedling with devices that create true penetration beyond 0.5 millimeters exists in a gray area that the board has never clearly resolved. I ran into this head-on in 2022 when a client asked me about using aDerma pen for scar treatment. The device goes past the papillary dermis at its deepest setting. I called the board office directly instead of guessing. The response I got was essentially: anything beyond 0.5mm is not covered under the esthetician license and could be considered an unlicensed medical procedure. They didn't give me a citation number or a written clarification, just that verbal answer. I stopped offering microneedling above that depth immediately and stuck to surface-level skin needling for product infusion only.
Laser hair removal and laser skin treatments are not part of the esthetician scope in Maryland. Some states allow licensed estheticians to operate lasers under physician supervision, but Maryland does not. That falls under medical practice. If you see an esthetician offering laser services in Maryland, they're either working outside their license or they hold a separate medical credential. It happens more often than the board seems to care about.
Where People Get Confused
The most common mistake I see is around chemical peel depth. Beginners think a higher percentage automatically means deeper penetration. That's not how it works. A 30% glycolic acid peel applied for 2 minutes behaves very differently from a 70% glycolic acid peel left on for the same duration. The board's position is that estheticians can use peels that affect only the epidermis, but the moment you see frosting on the skin, you've likely crossed into the dermis regardless of what the bottle says. Frosting is a clinical sign of a second-degree effect and it's where most estheticians accidentally step over the line. Another frequent confusion involves extractions. Manual extraction of comedones is within scope. Using a needle to lance a cyst or perform an incision is not. The distinction matters because some esthetians treat inflammatory acne with techniques that blur this boundary. I had a technician in her first year try to lance a deep cyst with a sterile needle and I had to correct her before she got herself in trouble with the board. The difference between popping a surface blackhead and cutting into a nodule is the difference between a facial and a surgical procedure, and the board has enforced that distinction in past disciplinary cases.
Get the Full Details

Practical Workarounds and Real-World Notes
Here's what the rulebooks won't tell you. Many salons in Maryland operate estheticians who perform services that sit in a regulatory gray area, and the board generally doesn't audit every appointment. But "they don't catch everyone" is not the same as "it's allowed." When you get investigated, the board doesn't care about what your competitor does. They care about whether your specific action fell within the statutory scope. If you want to offer something beyond the basic scope, there are legal pathways. Physician-supervised medical esthetics is one. A dermatologist or plastic surgeon can delegate certain procedures to estheticians under their direct supervision, and those delegated procedures become legitimate because they fall under the medical umbrella. I've seen this work well for clients who need post-procedure skincare management after laser treatments or surgical procedures. The esthetician performs the service, but the physician takes responsibility for the medical oversight. That structure keeps everyone compliant. Another workaround is obtaining a higher license level. Maryland offers an esthetician instructor license and a specialist esthetician license that expand what you can teach and demonstrate, though they don't materially broaden your hands-on clinical scope. If your goal is to do more clinical work, you'd need to pursue nursing or medical credentials instead. There's no shortcut around that.
What This System Gets Wrong
The Maryland framework predates many of the treatments that have become standard in the industry. Microneedling, LED light therapy, and radiofrequency devices weren't on anyone's radar when the current regulations were written. The board responds slowly to technology changes, which means there are entire categories of effective skincare tools that exist in a regulatory vacuum. You can sell a radiofrequency device to a spa, but using it on a client's face sits in a zone where the board hasn't said yes or no, and that silence creates liability even if it feels like permission. Another real limitation is the lack of clear written guidance. Most of what I know about scope boundaries comes from phone calls to the board, conversations with other practitioners, and occasionally hearing about enforcement actions after the fact. The board publishes the statute and regulations, but they don't publish FAQs or advisory opinions the way some licensing boards do. You're expected to interpret the law yourself, which is fine in theory but frustrating in practice when you're trying to run a business without accidentally breaking a rule nobody bothered to clarify. If you're new to Maryland esthetics, your safest move is to stick strictly to the published scope, document every treatment you perform with the products and concentrations you used, and when in doubt, call the board and ask. Keep a record of the answer. It won't protect you from everything, but it's better than guessing and finding out during an investigation.