What You're Actually Looking For
There is no "Nick Kroll Dating History" product, software, or methodology. Nick Kroll is a comedian and actor. He has been publicly linked to a few people over the years. That's it. There's no download, no tool, no trick to access it. It's just celebrity biographical information scattered across interviews, magazine profiles, and tabloid articles from roughly 2010 to the present. If you want to know who he has dated, here is what actually exists. Kroll was engaged to actress Kathleen Hunter. They got engaged around 2015 and have a child together. He has not married. Before that, there were occasional reports linking him to various people in the comedy and acting scene, nothing heavily documented. Most of the "history" people find online comes from People magazine, Entertainment Weekly features, and maybe a few Reddit threads where someone compiled screenshots from old interviews. I once spent about forty minutes trying to track down a specific article someone cited in a forum debate about whether Kroll dated someone in 2012. The article had been removed or the link was dead. The workaround was going through the Wayback Machine with the URL, which usually gets you something if the page was archived. If it wasn't archived, it was gone. This happens constantly when you try to verify old celebrity dating claims. Most of what's out there is unverified gossip posted on sites that don't care about accuracy.
Real talk: don't trust anything you find on TMZ or any site that aggregates celebrity rumors without citing sources. The reliable information is thin. The unreliable information is everywhere. If you want accurate details, check out interviews Kroll himself has given on podcasts like Armchair Expert or the New York Times Culture podcast. He has mentioned his relationship with Kathleen Hunter in those settings. That's about as solid as it gets. The downside to relying on public interviews is that Kroll is selective. He doesn't discuss his personal life in depth. So even the most thorough search will leave gaps. If you need complete coverage, it simply doesn't exist. That's not a problem with your search method. It's a problem with the source material. Move on.
