Advertisement
| business justification for hiring: The Good Jobs Strategy Zeynep Ton, 2014 A research-backed clarion call to CEOs and managers, making the controversial case that good, well-paying jobs are not only good for workers and for society--they're good for business, too. |
| business justification for hiring: Decisions and Orders of the National Labor Relations Board United States. National Labor Relations Board, 2008 |
| business justification for hiring: Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and Related Agencies Appropriations for 2000 United States. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations. Subcommittee on the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and Related Agencies, 1999 |
| business justification for hiring: The Oxford Handbook of Job Loss and Job Search Ute-Christine Klehe PhD, Edwin van Hooft PhD, 2018-05-08 Job search is and always has been an integral part of people's working lives. Whether one is brand new to the labor market or considered a mature, experienced worker, job seekers are regularly met with new challenges in a variety of organizational settings. Edited by Ute-Christine Klehe and Edwin A.J. van Hooft, The Oxford Handbook of Job Loss and Job Search provides readers with one of the first comprehensive overviews of the latest research and empirical knowledge in the areas of job loss and job search. Multidisciplinary in nature, Klehe, van Hooft, and their contributing authors offer fascinating insight into the diverse theoretical and methodological perspectives from which job loss and job search have been studied, such as psychology, sociology, labor studies, and economics. Discussing the antecedents and consequences of job loss, as well as outside circumstances that may necessitate a more rigorous job hunt, this Handbook presents in-depth and up-to-date knowledge on the methods and processes of this important time in one's life. Further, it examines the unique circumstances faced by different populations during their job search, such as those working job-to-job, the unemployed, mature job seekers, international job seekers, and temporary employed workers. Job loss and unemployment are among the worst stressors individuals can encounter during their lifetimes. As a result, this Handbook concludes with a discussion of the various types of interventions developed to aid the unemployed. Further, it offers readers important insights and identifies best practices for both scholars and practitioners working in the areas of job loss, unemployment, career transitions, outplacement, and job search. |
| business justification for hiring: Air Line Pilots Association, International V. United Air LInes, Inc , 1986 |
| business justification for hiring: Classified Index of National Labor Relations Board Decisions and Related Court Decisions , 2005 |
| business justification for hiring: Aluminum Welding and Machine Works, Inc. V. National Labor Relations Board , 1987 |
| business justification for hiring: California. Supreme Court. Records and Briefs California (State)., Court of Appeal Case(s): D007124 (lead)_x000D_ D007175 |
| business justification for hiring: Business and the Legal Environment Marianne Jennings, 1991 This text presents an approach to the laws and ethical issues that relate both to the public and the private laws of business. Each chapter contains recent edited cases, sample documents, and case problems. Among the topics discussed are drug testing, sexual harassment, insider trading, and affirmative action. |
| business justification for hiring: MICHIGAN EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION V DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA, INC., 393 MICH 116 (1974) , 1974 55065 |
| business justification for hiring: Classification Outline with Topical Index for Decisions of the National Labor Relations Board and Related Court Decisions United States. National Labor Relations Board, 1988 This outline provides a subject matter classification system for the procedureal and substantive legal issues of National Labor Relations Board decisions ... it is the classification system used for the Classified index of National Labor Relations Board decisions and related court decisions. It is also used for the Classified index of decisions of the regional directors of the National Labor Relations Board in representation proceedings--P. iii. |
| business justification for hiring: Digest, Canadian Case Law , 1911 |
| business justification for hiring: Digest Canadian Case Law Esten Kenneth Williams, 1914 |
| business justification for hiring: Ask a Manager Alison Green, 2018-05-01 From the creator of the popular website Ask a Manager and New York’s work-advice columnist comes a witty, practical guide to 200 difficult professional conversations—featuring all-new advice! There’s a reason Alison Green has been called “the Dear Abby of the work world.” Ten years as a workplace-advice columnist have taught her that people avoid awkward conversations in the office because they simply don’t know what to say. Thankfully, Green does—and in this incredibly helpful book, she tackles the tough discussions you may need to have during your career. You’ll learn what to say when • coworkers push their work on you—then take credit for it • you accidentally trash-talk someone in an email then hit “reply all” • you’re being micromanaged—or not being managed at all • you catch a colleague in a lie • your boss seems unhappy with your work • your cubemate’s loud speakerphone is making you homicidal • you got drunk at the holiday party Praise for Ask a Manager “A must-read for anyone who works . . . [Alison Green’s] advice boils down to the idea that you should be professional (even when others are not) and that communicating in a straightforward manner with candor and kindness will get you far, no matter where you work.”—Booklist (starred review) “The author’s friendly, warm, no-nonsense writing is a pleasure to read, and her advice can be widely applied to relationships in all areas of readers’ lives. Ideal for anyone new to the job market or new to management, or anyone hoping to improve their work experience.”—Library Journal (starred review) “I am a huge fan of Alison Green’s Ask a Manager column. This book is even better. It teaches us how to deal with many of the most vexing big and little problems in our workplaces—and to do so with grace, confidence, and a sense of humor.”—Robert Sutton, Stanford professor and author of The No Asshole Rule and The Asshole Survival Guide “Ask a Manager is the ultimate playbook for navigating the traditional workforce in a diplomatic but firm way.”—Erin Lowry, author of Broke Millennial: Stop Scraping By and Get Your Financial Life Together |
| business justification for hiring: Digest Canadian Case Law, 1900-1917 , 1914 |
| business justification for hiring: Fair Employment Practice Cases , 2003 With case table. |
| business justification for hiring: Decisions and Orders of the National Labor Relations Board, V. 343, September 28, 2004, Through December 20, 2004 , |
| business justification for hiring: Employment Discrimination Law Robert Belton, Dianne Avery, 1999 |
| business justification for hiring: Kilaru V. County of Milwaukee , 1984 |
| business justification for hiring: National Labor Relations Board V. 3 States Trucking, Inc , 1978 |
| business justification for hiring: Court Decisions Relating to the National Labor Relations Act United States. National Labor Relations Board, 1986 |
| business justification for hiring: California. Court of Appeal (3rd Appellate District). Records and Briefs California (State)., |
| business justification for hiring: Justice for Wards Cove Douglas M. Fryer, 2016-07-16 The book tells the story of a highly controversial civil rights case which involved the Alaska salmon industry. That industry is an intense summer operation in mostly remote wilderness. The participants were drawn from a wide range of sources: Natives who had harvested salmon for centuries, Italian, Croatian and Scandinavian fishermen and Asians who historically manned the canning lines. The unskilled cannery work was supplied by a predominantly Filipino controlled union. In the early 1970s young activist members of that union initiated a class action suit against Wards Cove Packing Company contending that minority employees were segregated into separate housing and messing and excluded from better paying jobs. The plaintiff s lost the case at trial to the surprise of many and multiple appeals followed. The Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision, over a bitter dissent, ruled in favor of Wards Cove holding that discrimination had not been proven by either the class of workers or by any single worker. The high courts decision was roundly criticized in the press and academia and Congress attempted to intervene. The executive branch became an advocate, first as a party, and later as a friend of the court but changed sides after an election. The case tested the boundary of separation of powers but ultimately the Supreme Court found a way to insulate its decisional process from Congressional interference. There has been a lingering misunderstanding of the case in the media. It has been recently re-enacted as a denial of justice and it has been described by some academics as the death knell of the civil rights movement. This book explains how the plaintiff s lost the main event at trial and how multiple appeals heard by 27 judges did not change the facts as found by the trial court as to what actually happened. |
| business justification for hiring: National Labor Relations Board V. Cutting, Incoporated , 1981 |
| business justification for hiring: California. Court of Appeal (2nd Appellate District). Records and Briefs California (State)., Received document entitled: RESPONDENTS' FEDERAL AUTHORITIES |
| business justification for hiring: California. Court of Appeal (1st Appellate District). Records and Briefs California (State)., |
| business justification for hiring: National Labor Relations Board V. Lincoln Hills Nursing Home, Inc , 1983 |
| business justification for hiring: Employment Practices Decisions , 2006 A full-text reporter of decisions rendered by Federal and State courts throughout the United States on Federal and State employment practices problems. |
| business justification for hiring: Business Law I Essentials MIRANDE. DE ASSIS VALBRUNE (RENEE. CARDELL, SUZANNE.), Renee de Assis, Suzanne Cardell, 2019-09-27 A less-expensive grayscale paperback version is available. Search for ISBN 9781680923018. Business Law I Essentials is a brief introductory textbook designed to meet the scope and sequence requirements of courses on Business Law or the Legal Environment of Business. The concepts are presented in a streamlined manner, and cover the key concepts necessary to establish a strong foundation in the subject. The textbook follows a traditional approach to the study of business law. Each chapter contains learning objectives, explanatory narrative and concepts, references for further reading, and end-of-chapter questions. Business Law I Essentials may need to be supplemented with additional content, cases, or related materials, and is offered as a foundational resource that focuses on the baseline concepts, issues, and approaches. |
| business justification for hiring: Reports of cases argued and determined in the Supreme Court of the State of Montana , 1993 |
| business justification for hiring: Equal Employment Opportunity ... Compliance Guide , 1999 |
| business justification for hiring: Hofstra Labor Law Journal , 1987 |
| business justification for hiring: Journal of Individual Employment Rights , 1992 |
| business justification for hiring: United States Code Annotated United States, 2009 Comprises all laws of a general and permenent nature under arrangement of the official Code of laws of the United States, with annotations from Federal and State courts. |
| business justification for hiring: United States Code Annotated Estados Unidos, 1982 |
| business justification for hiring: Employment Testing Manual James A. Douglas, Nancy Asquith, 1989 |
| business justification for hiring: Race, Racism, and American Law Atiba Ellis, Cheryl I. Harris, Justin Hansford, Amna A. Akbar, Audrey G. McFarlane, 2023-01-31 Intended for use with the authors’ forthcoming casebook, Race, Racism, and American Law, Seventh Edition (forthcoming 2023), Race, Racism, and American Law: Leading Cases and Materials includes significant historical and contemporary cases and materials edited with an aim to foreground the most relevant sections and passages to illustrate the crucial role of race in the formation of US law. This new edition of Derrick Bell’s groundbreaking textbook Race, Racism, and American Law, like prior versions, eschews a traditional casebook format. The locus of analysis in this text is the struggle for racial justice, and its underlying history and political context as reflected in the ongoing contestation over law, legal reform, and transformation. As such the supplement includes but is not limited to Supreme Court cases. We follow Bell’s model of locating all edited cases and materials in the supplement, reserving the book’s text to provide historical and political context for significant cases or legislative actions, along with hypothetical questions, comments, and other tools of analysis. Professors and students will benefit from: Both legal and non-legal primary source material.Leading Cases and Materials includes selected historical and contemporary cases, legislation, and other legal materials that foreground the crucial role of race and racism, and the struggle for racial justice, within and through US law. A carefully selected compilation of United States Supreme Court Cases. Each case is chosen to guide readers through elements of US jurisprudence which reflect both reform and retrenchment of societal inequity as it relates to the question of race. Cases range from significant 18th century cases such as Johnson v. McIntosh (1823) (indigenous people cannot transfer full title to land) to contemporary civil rights decisions such as Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee (2021) (further limiting the reach of the Voting Rights Act) and Comcast v. National Association of African American Owned Media (2020) (limiting protections against racial discrimination in contracting). Doctrinally and theoretically significant cases from lower federal courts and state courts. Cases from lower courts are selected to provide critical race insights into how judicial institutions outside the US Supreme Court shape doctrine and debates over race and racial inequality. Cases range from Acre v. Douglass (9th Cir. 2015) (ban on teaching of Mexican American studies found unconstitutional) to Lobato v. Taylor (Colo. 2003) (speculator attempts to divest Mexican American landowners with defective title derived from Mexico). Significant legislative and executive legal documents. This supplement includes materials going beyond traditional edited cases, reflecting the insight that a critical race analysis necessitates a grasp of law beyond the courts. Additional materials range from the United States Department of Justice Investigation of the Ferguson Police Department (2015) to the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act of 2020. Benefits for instructors and students: Provokes discussion on contemporary and historical legal controversies cases and materials edited to address issues the lens of critical race theory’s conceptual framework |
| business justification for hiring: Employment Discrimination Law Mack A. Player, Elaine W. Shoben, Risa L. Lieberwitz, 1990 |
| business justification for hiring: Cases and Materials on Employment Law Mark A. Rothstein, Andria S. Knapp, Lance Liebman, 1987 |
| business justification for hiring: Daily Labor Report , 1999 |
BUSINESS | English meaning - Cambridge Dictionary
BUSINESS definition: 1. the activity of buying and selling goods and services: 2. a particular company that buys and….
VENTURE | English meaning - Cambridge Dictionary
VENTURE definition: 1. a new activity, usually in business, that involves risk or uncertainty: 2. to risk going….
ENTERPRISE | English meaning - Cambridge Dictionary
ENTERPRISE definition: 1. an organization, especially a business, or a difficult and important plan, especially one that….
INCUMBENT | English meaning - Cambridge Dictionary
INCUMBENT definition: 1. officially having the named position: 2. to be necessary for someone: 3. the person who has or….
AD HOC | English meaning - Cambridge Dictionary
AD HOC definition: 1. made or happening only for a particular purpose or need, not planned before it happens: 2. made….
LEVERAGE | English meaning - Cambridge Dictionary
LEVERAGE definition: 1. the action or advantage of using a lever: 2. power to influence people and get the results you….
ENTREPRENEUR | English meaning - Cambridge Dictionary
ENTREPRENEUR definition: 1. someone who starts their own business, especially when this involves seeing a new opportunity….
CULTIVATE | English meaning - Cambridge Dictionary
CULTIVATE definition: 1. to prepare land and grow crops on it, or to grow a particular crop: 2. to try to develop and….
EQUITY | English meaning - Cambridge Dictionary
EQUITY definition: 1. the value of a company, divided into many equal parts owned by the shareholders, or one of the….
LIAISE | English meaning - Cambridge Dictionary
LIAISE definition: 1. to speak to people in other organizations, etc. in order to work with them or exchange….
BUSINESS | English meaning - Cambridge Dictionary
BUSINESS definition: 1. the activity of buying and selling goods and services: 2. a particular company that buys and….
VENTURE | English meaning - Cambridge Dictionary
VENTURE definition: 1. a new activity, usually in business, that involves risk or uncertainty: 2. to risk going….
ENTERPRISE | English meaning - Cambridge Dictionary
ENTERPRISE definition: 1. an organization, especially a business, or a difficult and important plan, especially one that….
INCUMBENT | English meaning - Cambridge Dictionary
INCUMBENT definition: 1. officially having the named position: 2. to be necessary for someone: 3. the person who has or….
AD HOC | English meaning - Cambridge Dictionary
AD HOC definition: 1. made or happening only for a particular purpose or need, not planned before it happens: 2. made….
LEVERAGE | English meaning - Cambridge Dictionary
LEVERAGE definition: 1. the action or advantage of using a lever: 2. power to influence people and get the results you….
ENTREPRENEUR | English meaning - Cambridge Dictionary
ENTREPRENEUR definition: 1. someone who starts their own business, especially when this involves seeing a new opportunity….
CULTIVATE | English meaning - Cambridge Dictionary
CULTIVATE definition: 1. to prepare land and grow crops on it, or to grow a particular crop: 2. to try to develop and….
EQUITY | English meaning - Cambridge Dictionary
EQUITY definition: 1. the value of a company, divided into many equal parts owned by the shareholders, or one of the….
LIAISE | English meaning - Cambridge Dictionary
LIAISE definition: 1. to speak to people in other organizations, etc. in order to work with them or exchange….
