Advertisement
| content standards in education: Educating One and All National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Board on Testing and Assessment, Committee on Goals 2000 and the Inclusion of Students with Disabilities, 1997-06-27 In the movement toward standards-based education, an important question stands out: How will this reform affect the 10% of school-aged children who have disabilities and thus qualify for special education? In Educating One and All, an expert committee addresses how to reconcile common learning for all students with individualized education for oneâ€the unique student. The book makes recommendations to states and communities that have adopted standards-based reform and that seek policies and practices to make reform consistent with the requirements of special education. The committee explores the ideas, implementation issues, and legislative initiatives behind the tradition of special education for people with disabilities. It investigates the policy and practice implications of the current reform movement toward high educational standards for all students. Educating One and All examines the curricula and expected outcomes of standards-based education and the educational experience of students with disabilitiesâ€and identifies points of alignment between the two areas. The volume documents the diverse population of students with disabilities and their school experiences. Because approaches to assessment and accountability are key to standards-based reforms, the committee analyzes how assessment systems currently address students with disabilities, including testing accommodations. The book addresses legal and resource implications, as well as parental participation in children's education. |
| content standards in education: Science Content Standards for California Public Schools California. Department of Education, California. State Board of Education, 2000 Represents the content of science education and includes the essential skills and knowledge students will need to be scientically literate citizens. Includes grade-level specific content for kindergarten through eighth grade, with sixth grade focus on earth science, seventh grade focus on life science, eighth grade focus on physical science. Standards for grades nine through twelve are divided into four content strands: physics, chemistry, biology/life sciences, and earth sciences. |
| content standards in education: Model School Library Standards for California Public Schools Faye Ong, 2011 Provides vision for strong school library programs, including identification of the skills and knowledge essential for students to be information literate. Includes recommended baseline staffing, access, and resources for school library services at each grade level. |
| content standards in education: Testing, Teaching, and Learning National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Board on Testing and Assessment, Committee on Title I Testing and Assessment, 1999-10-06 State education departments and school districts face an important challenge in implementing a new law that requires disadvantaged students to be held to the same standards as other students. The new requirements come from provisions of the 1994 reauthorization of Title I, the largest federal effort in precollegiate education, which provides aid to level the field for disadvantaged students. Testing, Teaching, and Learning is written to help states and school districts comply with the new law, offering guidance for designing and implementing assessment and accountability systems. This book examines standards-based education reform and reviews the research on student assessment, focusing on the needs of disadvantaged students covered by Title I. With examples of states and districts that have track records in new systems, the committee develops a practical decision framework for education officials. The book explores how best to design assessment and accountability systems that support high levels of student learning and to work toward continuous improvement. Testing, Teaching, and Learning will be an important tool for all involved in educating disadvantaged studentsâ€state and local administrators and classroom teachers. |
| content standards in education: California Common Core State Standards California. Department of Education, 2013 |
| content standards in education: National Standards & Grade-Level Outcomes for K-12 Physical Education SHAPE America - Society of Health and Physical Educators, 2014-03-13 Focused on physical literacy and measurable outcomes, empowering physical educators to help students meet the Common Core standards, and coming from a recently renamed but longstanding organization intent on shaping a standard of excellence in physical education, National Standards & Grade-Level Outcomes for K-12 Physical Education is all that and much more. Created by SHAPE America — Society of Health and Physical Educators (formerly AAHPERD) — this text unveils the new National Standards for K-12 Physical Education. The standards and text have been retooled to support students’ holistic development. This is the third iteration of the National Standards for K-12 Physical Education, and this latest version features two prominent changes: •The term physical literacy underpins the standards. It encompasses the three domains of physical education (psychomotor, cognitive, and affective) and considers not only physical competence and knowledge but also attitudes, motivation, and the social and psychological skills needed for participation. • Grade-level outcomes support the national physical education standards. These measurable outcomes are organized by level (elementary, middle, and high school) and by standard. They provide a bridge between the new standards and K-12 physical education curriculum development and make it easy for teachers to assess and track student progress across grades, resulting in physically literate students. In developing the grade-level outcomes, the authors focus on motor skill competency, student engagement and intrinsic motivation, instructional climate, gender differences, lifetime activity approach, and physical activity. All outcomes are written to align with the standards and with the intent of fostering lifelong physical activity. National Standards & Grade-Level Outcomes for K-12 Physical Education presents the standards and outcomes in ways that will help preservice teachers and current practitioners plan curricula, units, lessons, and tasks. The text also • empowers physical educators to help students meet the Common Core standards; • allows teachers to see the new standards and the scope and sequence for outcomes for all grade levels at a glance in a colorful, easy-to-read format; and • provides administrators, parents, and policy makers with a framework for understanding what students should know and be able to do as a result of their physical education instruction. The result is a text that teachers can confidently use in creating and enhancing high-quality programs that prepare students to be physically literate and active their whole lives. |
| content standards in education: National Standards for History National Center for History in the Schools (U.S.), Charlotte Antoinette Crabtree, Gary B. Nash, 1996 This sourcebook contains more than twelve hundred easy-to-follow and implement classroom activities created and tested by veteran teachers from all over the country. The activities are arranged by grade level and are keyed to the revised National History Standards, so they can easily be matched to comparable state history standards. This volume offers teachers a treasury of ideas for bringing history alive in grades 5?12, carrying students far beyond their textbooks on active-learning voyages into the past while still meeting required learning content. It also incorporates the History Thinking Skills from the revised National History Standards as well as annotated lists of general and era-specific resources that will help teachers enrich their classes with CD-ROMs, audio-visual material, primary sources, art and music, and various print materials. Grades 5?12 |
| content standards in education: Core Knowledge Sequence , 1997 |
| content standards in education: National Health Education Standards Joint Committee on National Health Education Standards, 2007 Concluding a two-year review and revision process supported by the American Cancer Society and conducted by an expert panel of health education professionals, this second edition of the National Health Education Standards is the foremost reference in establishing, promoting, and supporting health-enhancing behaviors for students in all grade levels. These guidelines and standards provide a framework for teachers, administrators, and policy makers in designing or selecting curricula, allocating instructional resources, and assessing student achievement and progress; provide students, families, and communities with concrete expectations for health education; and advocate for quality health education in schools, including primary cancer prevention for children and youth. |
| content standards in education: Standards for K-12 Engineering Education? National Research Council, Committee on Standards for K-12 Engineering Education, 2010-10-28 The goal of this study was to assess the value and feasibility of developing and implementing content standards for engineering education at the K-12 level. Content standards have been developed for three disciplines in STEM education-science, technology, and mathematic-but not for engineering. To date, a small but growing number of K-12 students are being exposed to engineering-related materials, and limited but intriguing evidence suggests that engineering education can stimulate interest and improve learning in mathematics and science as well as improve understanding of engineering and technology. Given this background, a reasonable question is whether standards would improve the quality and increase the amount of teaching and learning of engineering in K-12 education. The book concludes that, although it is theoretically possible to develop standards for K-12 engineering education, it would be extremely difficult to ensure their usefulness and effective implementation. This conclusion is supported by the following findings: (1) there is relatively limited experience with K-12 engineering education in U.S. elementary and secondary schools, (2) there is not at present a critical mass of teachers qualified to deliver engineering instruction, (3) evidence regarding the impact of standards-based educational reforms on student learning in other subjects, such as mathematics and science, is inconclusive, and (4) there are significant barriers to introducing stand-alone standards for an entirely new content area in a curriculum already burdened with learning goals in more established domains of study. |
| content standards in education: National Educational Technology Standards for Students International Society for Technology in Education, 2007 This booklet includes the full text of the ISTE Standards for Students, along with the Essential Conditions, profiles and scenarios. |
| content standards in education: Early Learning and Development Marilyn Fleer, 2010-03-22 Early Learning and Development offers new models of 'conceptual play' practice and theory. |
| content standards in education: Anti-Bias Education for Young Children and Ourselves Louise Derman-Sparks, Julie Olsen Edwards, 2020-04-07 Anti-bias education begins with you! Become a skilled anti-bias teacher with this practical guidance to confronting and eliminating barriers. |
| content standards in education: Texas High School Biology Castle Rock Research Corp, 2014-09 The SOLARO Study Guide is designed to help students achieve success in school. It is a complete guide to be used by students throughout the school year for reviewing and understanding course content, and for preparing for assessments. The content in Texas High School Biology is specifically aligned to the Texas state standards for those who intend to have students complete biology by the end of high school. Each Class Focus includes the following sections: Structure and Function of Living Things; Genetics; Evolution and Classification; Biological Macromolecules and Metabolism; Biological Systems; and Ecosystems. To create this book, teachers, curriculum specialists, and assessment experts have worked closely to develop the instructional pieces that explain each of the key concepts for the course. The practice questions and sample tests have detailed solutions that show problem-solving methods, highlight concepts that are likely to be tested, and point out potential sources of errors. Enhanced treatment of concepts, more practice sections, and additional learning tools are found in the accompanying online version of SOLARO which may be accessed through the web or on mobile devices. |
| content standards in education: A Framework for K-12 Science Education National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Board on Science Education, Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards, 2012-02-28 Science, engineering, and technology permeate nearly every facet of modern life and hold the key to solving many of humanity's most pressing current and future challenges. The United States' position in the global economy is declining, in part because U.S. workers lack fundamental knowledge in these fields. To address the critical issues of U.S. competitiveness and to better prepare the workforce, A Framework for K-12 Science Education proposes a new approach to K-12 science education that will capture students' interest and provide them with the necessary foundational knowledge in the field. A Framework for K-12 Science Education outlines a broad set of expectations for students in science and engineering in grades K-12. These expectations will inform the development of new standards for K-12 science education and, subsequently, revisions to curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development for educators. This book identifies three dimensions that convey the core ideas and practices around which science and engineering education in these grades should be built. These three dimensions are: crosscutting concepts that unify the study of science through their common application across science and engineering; scientific and engineering practices; and disciplinary core ideas in the physical sciences, life sciences, and earth and space sciences and for engineering, technology, and the applications of science. The overarching goal is for all high school graduates to have sufficient knowledge of science and engineering to engage in public discussions on science-related issues, be careful consumers of scientific and technical information, and enter the careers of their choice. A Framework for K-12 Science Education is the first step in a process that can inform state-level decisions and achieve a research-grounded basis for improving science instruction and learning across the country. The book will guide standards developers, teachers, curriculum designers, assessment developers, state and district science administrators, and educators who teach science in informal environments. |
| content standards in education: Common Core Nicholas Tampio, 2018-03-01 How the Common Core standardizes our kids’ education—and how it threatens our democracy. The Common Core State Standards Initiative is one of the most controversial pieces of education policy to emerge in decades. Detailing what and when K–12 students should be taught, it has led to expensive reforms and displaced other valuable ways to educate children. In this nuanced and provocative book, Nicholas Tampio argues that, though national standards can raise the education bar for some students, the democratic costs outweigh the benefits. To make his case, Tampio describes the history, philosophy, content, and controversy surrounding the Common Core standards for English language arts and math. He also explains and critiques the Next Generation Science Standards, the Advanced Placement US History curriculum framework, and the National Sexuality Education Standards. Though each set of standards has admirable elements, Tampio asserts that democracies should disperse education authority rather than entrust one political or pedagogical faction to decide the country’s entire philosophy of education. Ultimately, this lively and accessible book presents a compelling case that the greater threat to democratic education comes from centralized government control rather than from local education authorities. |
| content standards in education: Mathematics Framework for California Public Schools California. Curriculum Development and Supplemental Materials Commission, 1999 |
| content standards in education: Handbook of Research on Active Learning and Student Engagement in Higher Education Keengwe, Jared, 2022-06-10 Active learning occurs when a learning task can be related in a non-arbitrary manner to what the learner already knows and when there is a personal recognition of the links between concepts. The most important element of active learning is not so much in how information is presented, but how new information is integrated into an existing knowledge base. In order to successfully implement active learning into higher education, its effect on student engagement must be studied and considered. The Handbook of Research on Active Learning and Student Engagement in Higher Education focuses on assessing the effectiveness of active learning and constructivist teaching to promote student engagement and provides a wide range of strategies and frameworks to help educators and other practitioners examine the benefits, challenges, and opportunities for using active learning approaches to maximize student learning. Covering topics such as online learning environments and engagement approaches, this major reference work is ideal for academicians, practitioners, researchers, librarians, industry professionals, educators, and students. |
| content standards in education: Model Rules of Professional Conduct American Bar Association. House of Delegates, Center for Professional Responsibility (American Bar Association), 2007 The Model Rules of Professional Conduct provides an up-to-date resource for information on legal ethics. Federal, state and local courts in all jurisdictions look to the Rules for guidance in solving lawyer malpractice cases, disciplinary actions, disqualification issues, sanctions questions and much more. In this volume, black-letter Rules of Professional Conduct are followed by numbered Comments that explain each Rule's purpose and provide suggestions for its practical application. The Rules will help you identify proper conduct in a variety of given situations, review those instances where discretionary action is possible, and define the nature of the relationship between you and your clients, colleagues and the courts. |
| content standards in education: Visual and Performing Arts Framework , 2004 |
| content standards in education: Prioritizing the Common Core Larry Ainsworth, 2013 The consensus among educators nationwide is that in-depth instruction paired with focused assessment of essential concepts and skills are far more effective than superficially covering every concept and skill in the standards. Educators are faced with the task of teaching all standards while meeting the extraordinary range of student learning needs. Prioritizing the Common Core offers common sense solutions to the dilemmas teachers face today in implementing the new, more rigorous national standards. Chapters present a rationale for prioritizing the Common Core, a step-by-step process for prioritizing standards in language arts and mathematics, strategies for soliciting feedback and input from everyone in the district or school prior to the final determination of the Priority Standards, and detailed summaries of the process schools in six different districts used to identify their Priority Standards, with accompanying commentary by those who directed the work. |
| content standards in education: Content Knowledge John S. Kendall, Robert J. Marzano, 1996 Grade level: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, k, p, e, i, s, t. |
| content standards in education: Selecting Instructional Materials National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Board on Science Education, Committee on Developing the Capacity to Select Effective Instructional Materials, 1999-11-17 The National Science Education Standards set broad content goals for teaching grades K-12. For science teaching programs to achieve these goalsâ€indeed, for science teaching to be most effectiveâ€teachers and students need textbooks, lab kits, videos, and other materials that are clear, accurate, and help students achieve the goals set by the standards. Selecting Instructional Materials provides a rigorously field-tested procedure to help education decisionmakers evaluate and choose materials for the science classroom. The recommended procedure is unique, adaptable to local needs, and realistic given the time and money limitations typical to school districts. This volume includes a guide outlining the entire process for school district facilitators, and provides review instruments for each step. It critically reviews the current selection process for science teaching materialsâ€in the 20 states where the state board of education sets forth a recommended list and in the 30 states where materials are selected entirely by local decisionmakers. Selecting Instructional Materials explores how purchasing decisions are influenced by parent attitudes, political considerations, and the marketing skills of those who produce and sell science teaching materials. It will be indispensable to state and local education decisionmakers, science program administrators and teachers, and science education advocates. |
| content standards in education: Beyond Standards Morgan Polikoff, 2021-05-11 Beyond Standards highlights the structural conditions that have undermined the success of the standards movement and challenges us to confront them. The book offers an impassioned argument about the ways that our decentralized educational systems undermine the pursuit of educational equity and excellence. Morgan Polikoff applies a wide array of quantitative and qualitative data to provide a pointed critique of the US educational system. He addresses why standards have failed, whether standards-based reform can be salvaged, and what we can do to improve teaching and learning at scale across America's 13,000 school districts. Polikoff argues that no amount of tinkering can fix standards. Rather, we need to tackle the big, structural issues, such as decentralization. The author identifies curriculum reform as a high-leverage strategy for making meaningful progress at scale and emphasizes that states need to play a greater role in evaluating and recommending high-quality curriculum materials. Beyond Standards proposes a new, progressive vision that emphasizes the central role of states in challenging the antiquated, segregating structures that have thwarted educational improvement. |
| content standards in education: InTASC Model Core Teaching Standards The Council of Chief State School Officers, 2011-05-31 These new model core teaching standards outline what all teachers across all content and grade levels should know and be able to do to be effective in today's learning contexts. They are a revision of the 1992 model standards, in response to the need for a new vision of teaching to meet the needs of next generation learners. This document incorporates changes from a public feedback period in July 2010. |
| content standards in education: Ira Sleeps Over Bernard Waber, 1972 Ira is thrilled to spend the night at Reggie's until his sister raises the question of whether he should take his teddy bear. An appealing picture book which depicts common childhood qualms with empathy and humor.--Booklist. Full-color illustrations. |
| content standards in education: Head Start Program Performance Standards United States. Office of Child Development, 1975 |
| content standards in education: National Science Education Standards National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Board on Science Education, National Committee on Science Education Standards and Assessment, 1995-12-07 Americans agree that our students urgently need better science education. But what should they be expected to know and be able to do? Can the same expectations be applied across our diverse society? These and other fundamental issues are addressed in National Science Education Standardsâ€a landmark development effort that reflects the contributions of thousands of teachers, scientists, science educators, and other experts across the country. The National Science Education Standards offer a coherent vision of what it means to be scientifically literate, describing what all students regardless of background or circumstance should understand and be able to do at different grade levels in various science categories. The standards address: The exemplary practice of science teaching that provides students with experiences that enable them to achieve scientific literacy. Criteria for assessing and analyzing students' attainments in science and the learning opportunities that school science programs afford. The nature and design of the school and district science program. The support and resources needed for students to learn science. These standards reflect the principles that learning science is an inquiry-based process, that science in schools should reflect the intellectual traditions of contemporary science, and that all Americans have a role in improving science education. This document will be invaluable to education policymakers, school system administrators, teacher educators, individual teachers, and concerned parents. |
| content standards in education: Voluntary National Content Standards in Economics National Council on Economic Education, Foundation for Teaching Economics, 1997 This essential guide for curriculum developers, administrators, teachers, and education and economics professors, the standards were developed to provide a framework and benchmarks for the teaching of economics to our nation's children. |
| content standards in education: The Living Environment: Prentice Hall Br John Bartsch, 2009 |
| content standards in education: California English Language Development Standards Faye Ong, John McLean, 2012-11-01 |
| content standards in education: Reading in the Dark John Golden, 2001 To believe that students are not using reading and analytical skills when they watch or read a movie is to miss the power and complexities of film--and of students' viewing processes. This book encourages teachers to harness students' interest in film to help them engage critically with a range of media, including visual and printed texts. Toward this end, the book provides a practical guide to enabling teachers to feel comfortable and confident about using film in new and different ways. It addresses film as a compelling medium in itself by using examples from more than 30 films to explain key terminology and cinematic effects. And it then makes direct links between film and literary study by addressing reading strategies (e.g., predicting, responding, questioning, and storyboarding) and key aspects of textual analysis (e.g., characterization, point of view, irony, and connections between directorial and authorial choices). The book concludes with classroom-tested suggestions for putting it all together in teaching units on 11 films ranging from Elizabeth to Crooklyn to Smoke Signals. Some other films examined are E.T.,Life Is Beautiful,Rocky,The Lion King, and Frankenstein. (Contains 35 figures. Appendixes include a glossary of film terms, blank activity charts, and an annotated resource list.) (NKA) |
| content standards in education: No Child Left Behind Peter W. D. Wright, Pamela Darr Wright, Suzanne Whitney Heath, 2004 The No Child Left Behind Act is confusing to parents, educators, administrators, advocates, and most attorneys. This book provides a clear roadmap to the law and how to get better educational services for all children. Includes CD ROM of resources and references. |
| content standards in education: Physical Education Framework for California Public Schools, Kindergarten Through Grade Twelve California. Physical Education Curriculum Framework and Criteria Committee, 1994 This framework describes a developmental, sequential, age-appropriate physical education program designed to provide students of all ages with the knowledge and ability needed to maintain an active, healthy life-style. Three major goals of the curriculum are that students should: (1) develop effective motor skills and understand the fundamentals of movement by practicing and analyzing purposeful movement; (2) develop and maintain a positive self-image and strive to achieve personal excellence in planned physical activities; and (3) develop appropriate social behaviors by working independently and with others during planned physical activity. The guide, divided into six chapters, provides concepts and strategies that form the foundation of a comprehensive physical education system for kindergarten through grade 12. The chapter titles are: (1) A Vision for Physical Education; (2) Goals and Disciplines for the Physical Education Curriculum; (3) Physical Education Guidelines for Kindergarten through Grade 12; (4) Environment Needed for a Quality Physical Education Program; (5) Quality Instruction in Physical Education; and (6) Criteria for Evaluating Instructional Resources. A definition and outcomes of the physically educated person, a program advisory clarifying adapted physical education program services, and a list of publications available from the California Department of Education are appended. (LL) |
| content standards in education: Best Practice Steven Zemelman, Harvey Daniels, Arthur A. Hyde, 1998 In this extensively revised and expanded second edition, we find updated descriptions of progressive teaching in six subject areas: reading, writing, mathematics, science, social studies, and the arts. |
| content standards in education: Teaching Strategies GOLD Cate Heroman, 2010 |
| content standards in education: National School Library Standards for Learners, School Librarians, and School Libraries American Association of School Librarians, 2017-10-06 The new National School Library Standards for Learners, School Librarians, and School Libraries reflect an evolution of AASL Standards, building on philosophical foundations and familiar elements of previous standards while featuring the new streamlined AASL Standards Integrated Framework for learners, school librarians, and school libraries. |
| content standards in education: World History, Culture, and Geography , 1995 This resource book is designed to assist teachers in implementing California's history-social science framework at the 10th grade level. The models support implementation at the local level and may be used to plan topics and select resources for professional development and preservice education. This document provides a link between the framework's course descriptions and teachers' lesson plans by suggesting substantive resources and instructional strategies to be used in conjunction with textbooks and supplementary materials. The resource book is divided into eight units: (1) Unresolved Problems of the Modern World; (2) Connecting with Past Learnings: The Rise of Democratic Ideas; (3) The Industrial Revolution; (4) The Rise of Imperialism and Colonialism: A Case Study of India; (5) World War I and Its Consequences; (6) Totalitarianism in the Modern World: Nazi Germany and Stalinist Russia; (7) World War II: Its Causes and Consequences; and (8) Nationalism in the Contemporary World. Each unit contains references. (EH) |
| content standards in education: Catalyzing Change in High School Mathematics , 2018 Catalyzing Change in High School Mathematics : Initiating Critical Conversations is written for classroom teachers; counselors, coaches, specialists, and instructional leaders; school, district, and state administrators; curriculum developers; and policymakers at all levels with the goal of beginning a serious discussion of the issues for high school mathematics that are outlined in this document.-- |
| content standards in education: Wisconsin's Model Academic Standards for Technology Education John D. Fortier, 1998 Provides summaries of Technology Education for grade clusters K-5, 6-8, and 9-12. Content and performance standards are identified for grades 4, 8, and 12. Organized into four strands: Nature of Technology, Systems, Human Ingenuity, Impact of Technology. |
content是什么意思_content的翻译_音标_读音_用法_例句_爱词霸在线 …
爱词霸权威在线词典,为您提供content的中文意思,content的用法讲解,content的读音,content的同义词,content的反义词,content的例句等英语服务。
the content of是什么意思_the content of的翻译_音标_读音_用 …
The content of a book or document exclusive of prefatory matter, codicils, indexes, or appendices. 正文除去序言、补遗 、 索引和附录的书或文献的主要部分. …
content with是什么意思_content with的翻译_音标_读音_用法_例句…
爱词霸权威在线词典,为您提供content with的中文意思,content with的用法讲解,content with的读音,content with的同义词,content with的反义词,content with的例句等英 …
金山词霸在线翻译-177种语言互译_图片文档AI智能翻译免费_英语学习 …
金山词霸致力于为用户提供高效、精准的在线翻译服务，支持中、英、日、韩、德、法等177种语言在线翻译，涵盖即时免费的AI智能翻译、英语翻译、俄语翻译、日语翻译、 …
金山词霸-文本、图片、文档在线翻译词典
金山词霸致力于为用户提供高效、精准的在线翻译服务，支持中、英、日、韩、德、法等177种语言在线翻译，涵盖即时免费的AI智能翻译、英语翻译、俄语翻译、日语翻译、 …
content是什么意思_content的翻译_音标_读音_用法_例句_爱词霸在 …
爱词霸权威在线词典,为您提供content的中文意思,content的用法讲解,content的读音,content的同义词,content的反义词,content的例句等英语服务。
the content of是什么意思_the content of的翻译_音标_读音_用法_ …
The content of a book or document exclusive of prefatory matter, codicils, indexes, or appendices. 正文除去序言、补遗 、 索引和附录的书或文献的主要部分. 《简明英汉词典》
content with是什么意思_content with的翻译_音标_读音_用法_例 …
爱词霸权威在线词典,为您提供content with的中文意思,content with的用法讲解,content with的读音,content with的同义词,content with的反义词,content with的例句等英语服务。
金山词霸在线翻译-177种语言互译_图片文档AI智能翻译免费_英语 …
金山词霸致力于为用户提供高效、精准的在线翻译服务，支持中、英、日、韩、德、法等177种语言在线翻译，涵盖即时免费的AI智能翻译、英语翻译、俄语翻译、日语翻译、韩语翻译、图片 …
金山词霸-文本、图片、文档在线翻译词典
金山词霸致力于为用户提供高效、精准的在线翻译服务，支持中、英、日、韩、德、法等177种语言在线翻译，涵盖即时免费的AI智能翻译、英语翻译、俄语翻译、日语翻译、韩语翻译、图片 …
immersive是什么意思_immersive的翻译_音标_读音_用法_例句_爱 …
Immersive experiences with Flash video, content and applications with full - screen mode. 与Flash视频, 内容和全屏模式应用沉浸经验. 互联网
specific是什么意思_specific的翻译_音标_读音_用法_例句_爱词霸在 …
金山词霸致力于为用户提供高效、精准的在线翻译服务，支持中、英、日、韩、德、法等177种语言在线翻译，涵盖即时免费的AI智能翻译、英语翻译、俄语翻译、日语翻译、韩语翻译、图片 …
morphology是什么意思_morphology的翻译_音标_读音_用法_例句_ …
No longer can biologists be content simply to study morphology. 生物学家不再满足于简单地研究形态学. 辞典例句
fall是什么意思_fall的翻译_音标_读音_用法_例句_爱词霸在线词典
金山词霸致力于为用户提供高效、精准的在线翻译服务，支持中、英、日、韩、德、法等177种语言在线翻译，涵盖即时免费的AI智能翻译、英语翻译、俄语翻译、日语翻译、韩语翻译、图片 …
