Advertisement
| cross examination in court: The Art of Cross-examination Francis Lewis Wellman, 1904 |
| cross examination in court: Children and Cross-Examination J R Spencer, Michael Lamb, 2012-06-01 In 2009, Stephen Barker was convicted of rape on the evidence of a little girl who was four-and-a-half years old at the trial, and about three-and-a-half when first interviewed by the police. The high point of the proceedings was the child's appearance as a live witness in order for Barker's counsel to attempt a cross-examination. This case focused attention on the need, imposed by current English law, for even tiny children to come to court for a live cross-examination. In 1989, the Pigot Committee proposed a scheme under which the whole of a young child's evidence, including cross-examination, would be obtained out of court and in advance of trial. In 1999 a provision designed to give effect to this was included in the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act, but it has not yet been brought into force. The full Pigot proposal was implemented, however, in Western Australia, and similar schemes operate in a number of European jurisdictions. This book of essays examines a number of these schemes, and argues the case for further reforms in the UK. |
| cross examination in court: Excellence in Cross-examination Francis Lee Bailey, Kenneth J. Fishman, 2013 |
| cross examination in court: Maccarthy on Cross-examination Terence MacCarthy, 2007 Learn how to look good on cross, even when the witness is not cooperating. Learn how to manage and effectively minimize the witness's involvement, without appearing controlling, extracting, and insulting. Filled with illustrative cross examinations from actual cases, this book is your key to employing these proven techniques in your own practice. Using the three themes that run through out the book--looking good, telling a story, and using short statements--you can take control of your cross examinations and achieve the results you desire. |
| cross examination in court: The Art of Cross-examination Irving Younger, 1976 |
| cross examination in court: Florida Evidence Charles W. Ehrhardt, 1994-01-01 |
| cross examination in court: Culture Under Cross-Examination Tim Kelsall, 2009-10-22 This book examines the challenges posed by the largely unfamiliar culture in which the Special Court for Sierra Leone operates. |
| cross examination in court: The Art of Cross-Examination Francis L. Wellman, 2018-04-05 Reproduction of the original: The Art of Cross-Examination by Francis L. Wellman |
| cross examination in court: Fundamentals of Trial Techniques Thomas A. Mauet, Donald G. Casswell, Gordon P. MacDonald, 2001 This comprehensive text gives your students a sound methodology for trial preparation and reviews the thought processes a trial lawyer should utilize before and during each phase of a trial. Focusing primarily on jury trial, the authors cover the full range of topics from Jury Selection and Opening Statements to Objections and Trial Preparation and Strategy.--pub. desc. |
| cross examination in court: Relentless Criminal Cross-Examination Kevin J. Mahoney, 2018-03-30 How to (1) persuasively open with the weaknesses you will expose in the government’s case, and (2) demonstrate those weaknesses through your cross-examinations. Themes, angles of attack, pattern Q&A, and technique tips for cross-examining arresting officers, detectives, toxicologists, medical examiners, eyewitnesses, informants, and accomplices. |
| cross examination in court: Model Rules of Professional Conduct American Bar Association. House of Delegates, Center for Professional Responsibility (American Bar Association), 2007 The Model Rules of Professional Conduct provides an up-to-date resource for information on legal ethics. Federal, state and local courts in all jurisdictions look to the Rules for guidance in solving lawyer malpractice cases, disciplinary actions, disqualification issues, sanctions questions and much more. In this volume, black-letter Rules of Professional Conduct are followed by numbered Comments that explain each Rule's purpose and provide suggestions for its practical application. The Rules will help you identify proper conduct in a variety of given situations, review those instances where discretionary action is possible, and define the nature of the relationship between you and your clients, colleagues and the courts. |
| cross examination in court: Cross-Exam and the Kitchen Sink Patrick Malone, 2016-01-24 |
| cross examination in court: Cross Examination in International Arbitration Kaj I Hobér, Howard S. Sussman, 2014-03 A practical, self-teaching guide to effective cross-examination in international arbitration. Offers an introductory or quick-reference guide to essential cross-examination techniques and how they can best be best adapted to the arbitral format. |
| cross examination in court: Black's Law Roy Black, 2000-04-06 In a frank and enlightening look at our criminal courts, attorney Roy Black reveals his defense strategies in four cliffhanger cases. To Kill a Mockingbird, but with real characters.--Alan M. Dershowitz, author of Reversal of Fortune. |
| cross examination in court: Trial Tactics Stephen A. Saltzburg, 2007 |
| cross examination in court: Coping with Cross-examination and Other Pathways to Effective Testimony Stanley L. Brodsky, 2004-01-01 Health professionals, substance abuse counsellors, psychologists, handwriting analysts and experts on physical evidence should be interested in this book that teaches readers about the typical techniques attorneys use to challenge experts' credibility and the basis of their opinions. Pointers on preparation and effective narrative style are included, backed by findings from the emerging literature on the assessment of expert testimony. |
| cross examination in court: Trying Cases to Win Herbert Jay Stern, 1991 Herbert J. Stern, nationally recognized trial lawyer and accomplished teacher of trial techniques, will show you how to win cases.In Trying Cases to Win, Stern elaborates on the techniques he's made famous in his seminars and videos as he commits to print his methods and strategies for trying cases to win.'Herbert J. Stern's are the best trial advocacy books I have ever laid my eyes on, and I have spent thousands of dollars on my trial advocacy law library.'-- Francis A. Sparagna, Esq., Sparagna, Sparagna, Breslau & Ferrone, Van Nuys, CAStern's winning methods are now applied to cross-examination! This volume shows you how to argue the case through opposition witnesses, convert the information provided on direct examination to the benefit of the cross-examiner's case, and limit the direct testimony so it is not detrimental. Stern uses explanations of the techniques and actual case excerpts to dramatize his methods. |
| cross examination in court: Cross-examining Doctors Alan T. Radnor, 2010 |
| cross examination in court: The Art of Questioning Peter Megargee Brown, 2007 |
| cross examination in court: What Makes Juries Listen Sonya Hamlin, 1985 |
| cross examination in court: Winning at Cross-Examination Shane Read, 2020 |
| cross examination in court: Cross-examination Larry S. Pozner, Roger J. Dodd, 1993 Kept up to date by pocket parts. |
| cross examination in court: CROSS-EXAMINATION KYLA. LEE, 2021 |
| cross examination in court: Examining Witnesses Michael E. Tigar, 2003 This book covers virtually every type of witness and witness situation that a lawyer is likely to encounter. |
| cross examination in court: Putting on Mock Trials Margaret Fisher, 2002 Mock trials help students gain a basic understanding of the legal mechanism through which society chooses to resolve many of its disputes. Participation in mock trials helps students to understand better the roles that the various actors play in the justice system. This handbook explains how to prepare for and conduct mock trials in the classroom and introduces simplified rules of evidence and includes a sample judging form. |
| cross examination in court: The Art of Cross-examination Francis Lewis Wellman, 1911 |
| cross examination in court: The Trial Process J. Alexander Tanford, 2009 This book introduces students to the essential skills and bodies of knowledge required for competent representation of clients, including highly practical issues such as courtroom etiquette, the psychology of jury trials, ethical considerations, and trial tactics within a legal and procedural framework. Sample transcripts appear throughout the book to directly illustrate how to conduct various stages of a trial, such as voir dire, opening and closing statements, and direct and cross-examination. The accompanying documentary supplement for this book, Trial Practice Problems and Case Files, may also be used with any trial advocacy textbook that emphasizes skills and tactics. Part One of Trial Practice Problems and Case Files contains a basic series of problems derived from the case files contained in Part Two. Part Two has complete, self-contained case files for four criminal cases and three civil cases. When used for full trials, each case is designed to be evenly balanced so that both sides have realistic chances for favorable verdicts. The case files also provide an excellent basis for developing individual problems and exercises. A Teacher's Manual is available to professors. |
| cross examination in court: Effective Direct & Cross Examination William A. Brockett, 1986 |
| cross examination in court: Take the Witness: Cross-examination in International Arbitration Lawrence W. Newman, Ben H. Sheppard (Jr.), 2010-06-01 This volume is the “go to” reference for the arbitration practitioner who needs to master the art of cross-examination in the international arena. In this concise volume international arbitrators and world-class attorneys present proven techniques for the effective cross-examination of laypersons, adverse witnesses, scientific experts, legal experts and others anywhere in the world. |
| cross examination in court: Your Witness Steven F. Molo, James R. Figliulo, 2008 |
| cross examination in court: Michigan Court Rules Kelly Stephen Searl, William C. Searl, 1922 |
| cross examination in court: Basic Trial Techniques Roberto A. Abad, Blessilda B. Abad-Gamo, 2018 |
| cross examination in court: The Examination of Witnesses in Court: Including Examination in Chief, Cross-examination, and Re-examination, Founded on The Art of Winning Cases, by Henry Hardwicke, Edward W. Cox, Frederic John Wrottesley, 2022-10-26 This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant. |
| cross examination in court: Questioning of Complainants by Unrepresented Accused in Sexual Offence Trials New South Wales. Law Reform Commission, 2003 Trial practice, defence and cross-examination in sex crimes in New South Wales. |
| cross examination in court: The Art of Cross-Examination Francis L. Wellman, 2014-03-27 The Art of Cross-Examination - Witness Interrogation Techniques - By Francis L. Wellman - Legal Education Cross-examination is considered an essential component of a jury trial because of the impact it has on the opinions of the judge and jury. Few lawyers practice trial law or complex litigation and typically refer such cases to those who have the time, resources and experience to handle a complex trial and the commitment involved to complete a trial successfully. Few attorneys get the practice necessary to develop the techniques needed to do an effective job cross-examining a witness. It is sometimes referred to as an art form, because of the need for an attorney to know precisely how to elicit the testimony from the opposing witness that will help, not hinder, their client's case. Typically a cross-examiner must not only be effective at getting the witness to reveal the truth, but in most cases to reveal confusion as to the facts such as time, dates, people, places, wording etc. More often than not a cross-examiner will also attempt to undermine the credibility of a witness if he or she will not be perceived to be a bully (such as discrediting a very elderly person or young child). The cross-examiner often needs to discredit a potentially biased or damaging witness in the eyes of the jury without appearing to be doing so in an unfair way. Typically the cross-examiner must appear friendly, talk softly and sincerely to relax the guarded witness. Or on other occasions they may start by being more confrontational, unsettling an already disturbed witness. They typically begin repeating similar basic questions in a variety of different ways to get different responses, which will then be used against the witness as misstatements of fact later when the attorney wants to make their point. If it is too obvious the questions are too clearly repetitive and making the witness nervous, the other attorney may accuse the cross examiner of badgering the witness. There is a fine line between badgering and getting the witness to restate facts differently that is typically pursued. In offering this book to the legal profession I do not intend to arrogate to myself any superior knowledge upon the subject, excepting in so far as it may have been gleaned from actual experience. Nor have I attempted to treat the subject in any scientific, elaborate, or exhaustive way; but merely to make some suggestions upon the art of cross-examination, which have been gathered as a result of twenty-five years' court practice, during which time I have examined and cross-examined about fifteen thousand witnesses, drawn from all classes of the community. If what is here written affords anything of instruction to the younger members of my profession, or of interest or entertainment to the public, it will amply justify the time taken from my summer vacation to put in readable form some points from my experience upon this most difficult subject. |
| cross examination in court: Cross-examination of Witnesses Roberto Aron, 1989 |
| cross examination in court: New York Matrimonial Trial Handbook Joel Brandes, 2017 The New York Matrimonial Trial Handbook, by Joel R. Brandes, of the New York Bar, was written for both the attorney who has never tried a matrimonial action and for the experienced litigator. It is not a treatise. It is a how to book for lawyers. This handbook is a companion work to his treatise, Law and the Family New York, 2d (Thomson Reuters Westlaw), which contains extensive coverage of the substantive and procedural law related to matrimonial actions and family court proceedings. The New York Matrimonial Trial Handbook focuses on the procedural and substantive law, as well as the law of evidence, that an attorney must have at his or her fingertips when trying a matrimonial action. It is intended to be an aide for preparing for a trial and as a reference for the procedure in offering and objecting to evidence during a trial. The book deals extensively with the testimonial and documentary evidence necessary to meet the burden of proof. There are thousands of suggested questions for the examination of witnesses at trial to establish each cause of action and requests for ancillary relief, as well as for the cross-examination of difficult witnesses. |
| cross examination in court: The Art of Cross-examination Francis L. Wellman, 2015-07-20 The issue of a cause rarely depends upon a speech and is but seldom even affected by it. But there is never a cause contested, the result of which is not mainly dependent upon the skill with which the advocate conducts his cross-examination. This is the conclusion arrived at by one of England's greatest advocates at the close of a long and eventful career at the Bar. It was written some fifty years ago and at a time when oratory in public trials was at its height. It is even more true at the present time, when what was once commonly reputed a great speech is seldom heard in our courts, -because the modern methods of practising our profession have had a tendency to discourage court oratory and the development of orators. |
| cross examination in court: The Receipt of Evidence by Queensland Courts Queensland. Law Reform Commission, 2000 The receipt of evidence by Queensland courts: the evidence of children (Report no 55, pt 2) |
| cross examination in court: The Art of Cross-examination Francis Lewis Wellman, 1910 |
Jesus and the Cross - Biblical Archaeology Society
Jan 26, 2025 · The cross remains as you said, as a symbol of the degradation and suffering that Jesus submitted his body as a sacrifice for the sins of humanity. The cross with or without the …
How Was Jesus Crucified? - Biblical Archaeology Society
Apr 16, 2025 · Gospel accounts of Jesus’s execution do not specify how exactly Jesus was secured to the cross. Yet in Christian tradition, Jesus had his palms and feet pierced with …
Roman Crucifixion Methods Reveal the History of Crucifixion
Aug 17, 2024 · Nailing to a cross is “less severe” and “less humiliating” as the condemned dies within a day from loss of blood. Tying to a cross is the most severe form of punishment usually …
The Staurogram - Biblical Archaeology Society
Sep 24, 2024 · But the cross had nothing to do with Jesus Christ. The New Catholic Encyclopedia explains: “The cross is found in both pre-Christian and non-Christian cultures.” Jesus did not …
Ancient Crucifixion Images - Biblical Archaeology Society
Mar 15, 2025 · The cross is the ultimate symbol for the crucifixion of Christ. I give out pennies with the cross punched in them and tell people whether you are an atheist, Muslim, Moonie, etc. …
What is the difference between cross_validate and cross_val_score?
Mar 11, 2021 · Note: When the cv argument is an integer, cross_val_score uses the KFold or StratifiedKFold strategies by default, the latter being used if the estimator derives from …
A Tomb in Jerusalem Reveals the History of Crucifixion and …
Aug 6, 2024 · The second device added to the cross was the suppedaneum, or foot support. It was less painful than the sedile, but it also prolonged the victim’s agony. Ancient historians …
When to use cross-validation? - Data Science Stack Exchange
Jan 23, 2021 · Cross-validation. Hi, I'm deploying machine learning models in my MSc thesis using Weka. I have noticed that when I use 10-fold cross-validation in the training dataset I get …
Cross validation - Data Science Stack Exchange
Apr 17, 2024 · Then cross-validation is only applied to the training data as it is part of the training process. The other issue raised in the linked post do not seem to me specific to cross …
Nested-cross validation pipeline and confidence intervals
Nov 26, 2024 · However, I would like to point out that the "class imbalance problem" is not at all the big problem that it is sometimes made out to be. See the following two threads over at …
Jesus and the Cross - Biblical Archaeology Society
Jan 26, 2025 · The cross remains as you said, as a symbol of the degradation and suffering that Jesus submitted his body as a sacrifice for the sins of …
How Was Jesus Crucified? - Biblical Archaeology Society
Apr 16, 2025 · Gospel accounts of Jesus’s execution do not specify how exactly Jesus was secured to the cross. Yet in Christian tradition, Jesus had …
Roman Crucifixion Methods Reveal the History of Crucifixi…
Aug 17, 2024 · Nailing to a cross is “less severe” and “less humiliating” as the condemned dies within a day from loss of blood. Tying to a cross is the most …
The Staurogram - Biblical Archaeology Society
Sep 24, 2024 · But the cross had nothing to do with Jesus Christ. The New Catholic Encyclopedia explains: “The cross is found in both pre …
Ancient Crucifixion Images - Biblical Archaeology Society
Mar 15, 2025 · The cross is the ultimate symbol for the crucifixion of Christ. I give out pennies with the cross punched in them and tell people …
